IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/alf/wpaper/2022-01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The climate dimension of fiscal policy sustainability: best practices in Green Budgeting and lessons for Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Marinheiro
  • Amilcar Sousa
  • Ana Pinheiro

Abstract

The Green Budgeting technique is being adopted by an increasing number of countries and has the potential to align fiscal policy objectives with climate and environmental goals. Given that the (financial) sustainability of public finances and environmental sustainability are intrinsically interconnected with each other, this paper argues that the traditional public debt sustainability analysis should be expanded to encompass climate and environmental sustainability considerations. Other key elements of a proper budgetary framework, such as fiscal transparency should also be broadened to include the disclosure of the environmental and climate impacts of fiscal policy. Green Budgeting is a growing technique that can be used to expand the scope of such usual fiscal concepts. One of the main tools for its adoption is Green Budget Tagging, which enables citizens to assess the environmental and climate impacts of fiscal policy, on both the tax and spending sides of the state budget. It enables to capture both the positive and negative impacts of fiscal policy. Additionally, it provides more visibility to the amount of resources countries allocate to climate and environment goals and to mitigation and adaptation policies, while allowing the assessment of whether such goals are attained. A proper working fiscal framework, including the adoption of accrual accounting and performance programme budgeting, seems to be instrumental in this domain along with strong political commitment. Portugal already took a few steps, such as recently enacted Climate Law, but still has a long way to go in terms of Green Budgeting. This paper proposes a roadmap for its adoption. To start with, both the completion of the public accounts reform and the full adoption of programme budgeting foreseen in the 2015 Budgetary Framework Law should be attained. The meeting of such two pre-conditions will then lay the foundations for the implementation of Green Budgeting and to disclose the climate and environmental impacts of policy measures, following the international best practices. The adoption of Green Budgeting might also pave the way to the emission of Green Bonds to finance specific environmental and climate related projects. Such bonds might be a cost-effective way to finance the substantial green investment needs in a highly indebted country while contributing to the decrease of global risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Marinheiro & Amilcar Sousa & Ana Pinheiro, 2022. "The climate dimension of fiscal policy sustainability: best practices in Green Budgeting and lessons for Portugal," CFP Working Papers 01/2022, Portuguese Public Finance Council.
  • Handle: RePEc:alf:wpaper:2022-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cfp.pt/en/publications/other-publications/the-climate-dimension-of-fiscal-policy-sustainability-best-practices-in-green-budgeting-and-lessons-for-portugal
    File Function: First version, 2022
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    green budgeting; sustainability; green tagging; green financing; budgeting; Portugal;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H5 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • H63 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alf:wpaper:2022-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Helena Rua (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cfpgvpt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.