IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aiz/louvar/2021006.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparison of chemometrics strategies for the spectroscopic monitoring of active pharmaceutical ingredients in chemical reactions

Author

Listed:
  • Thiel, Michel
  • Sauwen, Nicolas
  • Khamiakova, Tastiana
  • Maes, Tor
  • Govaerts, Bernadette

    (Université catholique de Louvain, LIDAM/ISBA, Belgium)

Abstract

The Process Analytical Technology (PAT) initiative promoted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) encourages pharmaceutical companies to increase the use of new analytical technologies to perform constant monitoring of the critical quality attributes (CQA), allowing a better understanding and a better control of the process. This paper presents a practical framework based on different dimension-reduction methods as well as calibration methods aimed at following over time chemical experiments organized in batches. To illustrate it, this paper uses pharmaceutical data collected in a research and development context towards industrial production. This methodological framework aims to reach two objectives. The first objective is to visualize and interpret in real time, or off-line, the kinetics of chemical reactions using the following dimension-reduction methods: principal component analysis (PCA), non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and multivariate curve resolution (MCR). The results show that, due to their additional constraints, NMF and MCR allow a better interpretability of chemical reactions than PCA with a comparable quality of fit. Moreover, eventough NMF and MCR come from different fields, their algorithms share many similarities and produce close results. The second objective is to predict chemical component concentrations over time. For this second objective, the partial least squares regression (PLSR) is used in a one-step approach and compared with a two-step approach combining multivariate regression with PCA, NMF or MCR. The results show that spectra or scores obtained from unsupervised approaches PCA, NMF or MCR can be used to predict concentrations of the main chemical compounds continuously over all the time of the reaction with a good precision and with a gain of interpretability. For both objectives, possible model validation indices are also discussed including a leave-one-batch-out approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Thiel, Michel & Sauwen, Nicolas & Khamiakova, Tastiana & Maes, Tor & Govaerts, Bernadette, 2021. "Comparison of chemometrics strategies for the spectroscopic monitoring of active pharmaceutical ingredients in chemical reactions," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2021006, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
  • Handle: RePEc:aiz:louvar:2021006
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2021.104273
    Note: In: Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Vol. 211, p. 104273 (2021)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiz:louvar:2021006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nadja Peiffer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isuclbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.