IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uwauwp/244151.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Willingness to Pay for Revegetating the City of Subiaco’s Railway Reserve. A Choice Experiment to Determine Public Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • de Vos, Gunther
  • Kragt, Marit E
  • Pandit, Ram

Abstract

Residents of the City of Subiaco (Western Australia) demonstrate a willingness to pay for revegetating the Railway Reserve. The Railway Reserve is the area of land immediately along both sides of the Fremantle Railway Line. The City of Subiaco aims to revegetate all available land in the Reserve with native plants to create a green link between Kings Park, Bold Park and other parks in the area. This study used a choice experiment to determine public preferences and to estimate willingness to pay for different ways of managing the Railway Reserve. Conditional logit model results show that residents prefer to have a larger proportion of the area revegetated, to add shrubs and/or trees to the ground-covering plants, and to add management for wildlife habitat such as nest boxes for birds and bats. No significant preference was found for the inclusion of interpretative signs. The average respondent was willing to pay 0.27 Australian dollars per household per year for every extra percent of the Reserve to be revegetated. To add management for wildlife habitat, the average respondent was willing to pay 14.15 Australian dollars per household per year. A higher willingness to pay for a larger revegetated proportion and for the wildlife management was found among females and among frequent users of the walking and bicycle path along the railway line. Residents who live further away from the railway line and residents who feel less safe as a result of dense urban vegetation demonstrated a lower willingness to pay per percentage of area revegetated. Results from the survey also indicate that respondents valued urban greenery more for the habitat it provides for wildlife than for the recreational opportunities or as a buffer against noise. The results from the choice experiment reinforce the current management strategies by the City of Subiaco. The current management strategy represents a total willingness to pay among residents of 480,750 Australian dollars per year. This study could be replicated in other local council areas along the Fremantle Railway Line to determine the values that the Railway Reserve provides to residents of other areas in Perth.

Suggested Citation

  • de Vos, Gunther & Kragt, Marit E & Pandit, Ram, 2016. "Willingness to Pay for Revegetating the City of Subiaco’s Railway Reserve. A Choice Experiment to Determine Public Preferences," Working Papers 244151, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uwauwp:244151
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.244151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/244151/files/SARE%20WP%201611_%20de%20Vos%20Kragt%20Pandit_%20WTP%20for%20revegetating%20Subiaco%20Railway%20Reserve.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.244151?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uwauwp:244151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aruwaau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.