IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/utaeer/302978.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The U.S.-China Phase One Trade Agreement: Implications for U.S. Forestry

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad, Andrew
  • Smith, S. Aaron

Abstract

On January 15, 2020, the U.S. and China signed a “Phase One” trade deal to address desired structural reforms and other changes to the Chinese economy affecting international trade and foreign investment. The U.S.-China Phase One Trade Agreement, which is the first agreement in what is expected to be a series of agreements, focuses on reforms in the Chinese economy in the areas of intellectual property, technology transfer, agriculture, financial services, and currency and foreign exchange. The agreement also includes commitments by China to purchase additional U.S. goods over the next two years, including significant purchases of U.S. agricultural, food, fish and forest products (USTR, 2020a). Although the U.S. has agreed not to impose additional tariffs on imports from China, and China has agreed to reduce or eliminate certain tariffs imposed in retaliation, the Phase One Agreement does not specifically address the escalating tariffs between the two countries due to the ongoing trade dispute that started in 2018. However, the agreement signifies a decrease in tensions and a possible path to tariff reductions and eliminations in the future. This is particularly important for U.S. forest product exports, which suffered significant losses in 2018 and 2019 from Chinese retaliatory tariffs. In this report, we provide the context and overview of the U.S.-China Phase One Trade Agreement and implications for U.S. forest product exports. Forest products are a major agricultural and agriculture-related export for the U.S. However, the negative impact of the trade dispute on the sector has received little attention compared to other agricultural commodities such as soybeans and cotton. Over the last decade, the sector has become increasingly reliant on China for sales and suffered considerable losses from the retaliatory tariffs that China imposed (Ward, 2019; Pryor, 2019). The U.S.-China Phase One Trade Agreement sets the stage for a decrease in tensions between the two countries and the eventual removal of Chinese tariffs on U.S. products. This could result in considerable gains for the U.S. forest product sector moving forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad, Andrew & Smith, S. Aaron, 2020. "The U.S.-China Phase One Trade Agreement: Implications for U.S. Forestry," Extension Reports 302978, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:302978
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.302978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/302978/files/W888.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.302978?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad, Andrew & Taylor, Adam, 2020. "Implications of COVID-19 on Tennessee Exports of Forest Products," Extension Reports 303914, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    2. Muhammad, Andrew & Jones, Keithly G., 2021. "The end of the trade war? Effects of tariff exclusions on U.S. forest products in China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Demand and Price Analysis; International Relations/Trade; Land Economics/Use;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:302978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dautkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.