IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/utaeer/302741.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tennessee Consumers' Views About Cidery Visits

Author

Listed:
  • Jensen, Kimberly
  • Hughes, David
  • Wright, Hannah
  • DeLong, Karen
  • Gill, Mackenzie
  • Menard, Jamey

Abstract

Hard apple ciders have been a growing segment of alcoholic beverage consumption and, as of 2019, there were 1,145 cider makers in the U.S. (Cyder Market 2019). Hard cidermaking facilities are called cideries. Cideries may use apple juice that is purchased, apples purchased and pressed into juice, or apples grown on-site then pressed into juice to make the hard cider. Hence, some cideries grow apples on-site to make their cider, while others purchase juice or apples. Cider is not brewed like beer; rather, it is fermented using a process similar to making wine. Like wineries or breweries, cideries can constitute an agritourism destination. For example, wine trails have been used to tie winery visits with those to nearby attractions, services and accommodations (Che & Wargenau, 2011). As noted, cideries could also serve as attractions in concert with rural landscapes and other nearby attractions, services and accommodations (Smith and Lal 2017). In addition to the cider-making experience, visitors could also have the opportunity to visit orchards where the cider apples are produced. While some other states have a well-developed hard cider industry, the industry in Tennessee is just beginning. The state currently has 12 cider makers (Cyder Market 2019). New York, California, Michigan, Washington and Oregon have the largest number of cider producers (Cyder Market 2019). Given that the cider industry is emerging in Tennessee, little market information exists about preferences by consumers in the state regarding hard apple ciders or tourism visits to cideries. The industry could potentially benefit from information regarding Tennessee consumer preferences for cider and cidery services. The overall goal of this research is to develop a greater understanding of the Tennessee market for hard apple cider and to explore ways to facilitate the growth of the state’s emerging hard cider industry. The information from this study should be of interest to entrepreneurs and businesses that are interested in beginning or expanding hard cider-making enterprises in Tennessee. The objectives of this study are to provide market information about Tennessee consumers’ views on visiting cideries in the state, the distances they would be willing to travel to visit a cidery, their expenditures at cideries, what services/amenities they view as important when they visit cideries, and the factors that might influence their purchases of hard ciders at cideries.

Suggested Citation

  • Jensen, Kimberly & Hughes, David & Wright, Hannah & DeLong, Karen & Gill, Mackenzie & Menard, Jamey, 2019. "Tennessee Consumers' Views About Cidery Visits," Extension Reports 302741, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:302741
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.302741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/302741/files/W856.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.302741?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jensen, Kimberly L. & Hughes, David L. & DeLong, Karen L. & Trejo-Pech, Carlos O. & Gill, Mackenzie B., 2021. "Factors Influencing Tennessee Adults’ Craft Hard Apple Cidery Visit Expenditures and Travel Distance," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 52(2), July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Community/Rural/Urban Development; Demand and Price Analysis; Marketing;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:302741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dautkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.