IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uqseee/47995.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Safety and Socio-Economic Issues Raised by Modern Biotechnology

Author

Listed:
  • Xue, Dayuan
  • Tisdell, Clement A.

Abstract

Modern new biotechnology has the potential to provide major economic and other benefits, but at the same time it poses potential hazards for human health, the environment, the ‘natural’ biological order and can have adverse socio-economic consequences. The application of such technology frequently violates traditional ethical, moral and religious values. This paper after outlining possible benefits of modern new biotechnologies, discusses the type of biosafety risks which they pose, their possible adverse consequences for the sustainability of biodiversity and agriculture and their potential impacts on socioeconomic welfare and traditional cultures. Particular concern is expressed about the possible consequences of such technologies for developing countries and the practice in some developed countries of issuing patents conferring very broad rights over the use of genetically engineered material. Because these rights are so broad in some cases they have the potential to establish powerful multinational monopolies in the hands of private companies. Global debate about these issues suggest that more emphasis should be given globally to the socio-economic consequences of such technology than in the past. The need for this is highlighted by the North-South divide. Developing countries lag considerably in this new technological field, are placed in a dependant position and have weak institutional structures to control the application of such technology

Suggested Citation

  • Xue, Dayuan & Tisdell, Clement A., 1999. "Safety and Socio-Economic Issues Raised by Modern Biotechnology," Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers 47995, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uqseee:47995
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.47995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/47995/files/WP36.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.47995?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sally Lehrman, 1997. "Jewish leaders seek genetic guidelines⃛," Nature, Nature, vol. 389(6649), pages 322-322, September.
    2. David Shapiro, 1997. "Cloning, dignity and ethical reasoning," Nature, Nature, vol. 388(6642), pages 511-511, August.
    3. Meredith Wadman, 1997. "EPA to be sued over gene-modified crops," Nature, Nature, vol. 389(6649), pages 317-317, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    RePEc Biblio mentions

    As found on the RePEc Biblio, the curated bibliography for Economics:
    1. > Economic Development Technological Change, and Growth > Technological Change: Choices and Consequences

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clem Tisdell, 2003. "Coevolution, agricultural practices and sustainability: some major social and ecological issues," Chapters, in: Ecological and Environmental Economics, chapter 19, pages 254-264, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Clem Tisdell, 2013. "Economics, ecology and GMOs: sustainability, precaution and related issues," Chapters, in: M. A. Quaddus & M. A.B. Siddique (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development Planning, chapter 5, pages 91-118, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Donaghy, Peter & Rolfe, John & Bennett, Jeffrey W., 2004. "Quasi-option values for enhanced information regarding genetically modified foods," 2004 Conference (48th), February 11-13, 2004, Melbourne, Australia 58403, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uqseee:47995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decuqau.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.