IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/unahmp/32768.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Feedlot '99, Part I: Baseline Reference Of Feedlot Management Practices, 1999

Author

Listed:
  • Unknown

Abstract

The National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS) is sponsored by the USDA:APHIS: Veterinary Services (VS). The NAHMS Feedlot '99 Study included feedlots of 1000-head or greater capacity from the 12 leading cattle feeding states. Feedlots included in the study represented 84.9 percent of U.S. feedlots of this size and contained 96.1 percent of the U.S. feedlot cattle inventory on feedlots with 1000-head or greater capacity as of January 1, 2000. For the purposes of the study, operations were grouped into two size categories: those with capacities of between 1000 and 7999 head, and those with capacities of 8000 head or more. Beef animals were the main type of cattle placed in feedlots regardless of operation size. Approximately one-half of the placements in small and large operations were steers and heifers greater than 700 pounds. The largest source of cattle for small operations was directly from auction markets (46.9 percent of cattle). For large operations, the largest percentage (44.1 percent) of cattle was acquired through custom feeding, either by agreement with another party or via joint ownership with the feedlot. Almost all (97.8 percent) operations that processed cattle administered vaccines to aid in the prevention of respiratory disease. Most operations that processed cattle after arrival (68.0 percent) made some adjustments to processing procedure based on attributes of arriving cattle. Adjustment was more common in large operations (72.7 percent) than in small operations. A greater percentage (80.0 percent) of steers and heifers weighing less than 700 lbs. at the time of placement received more than one implant as compared with those weighing 700 lbs. or more at the time of placement (30.4 percent). Greater than 95 percent of operations considered each of the following quality assurance programs very or somewhat important: location of injections, route of injections, implanting strategy, antimicrobial selection, and measures to avoid residues. Contact for this paper: Lindsey Garber.

Suggested Citation

  • Unknown, 2000. "Feedlot '99, Part I: Baseline Reference Of Feedlot Management Practices, 1999," Miscellaneous Publications 32768, United States Department of Agriculture, National Animal Health Monitoring System.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:unahmp:32768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/32768/files/fd99des1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:unahmp:32768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://nahms.aphis.usda.gov/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.