IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/umcffm/293333.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

2012 Organic Farm Performance in Minnesota

Author

Listed:
  • Nordquist, Dale
  • Moynihan, Meg
  • Dvergsten, Ron

Abstract

This report summarizes individual farm financial results for organic FBM participants in the Minnesota Organic Farm Business Management Project for 2012 and provides comparisons to previous years. The report includes whole-farm information as well as costs and returns for individual enterprises. The year-end analysis of the individual farms was completed by Minnesota FBM instructors or by Minnesota Farm Management Associations. A total of 56 organic farms reported data for 2012. Of those, 37 were "completely organic," meaning that all of the agricultural products produced on the farm were produced under organic certification. The others were "split operations," which have some certified organic and some conventional production. The Whole Farm Results section of this report summarizes only the completely organic farms, whereas the crop and dairy enterprise reports include data on the organic production from both completely organic and split operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nordquist, Dale & Moynihan, Meg & Dvergsten, Ron, 2013. "2012 Organic Farm Performance in Minnesota," CFFM Reports 293333, University of Minnesota, Center for Farm Financial Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:umcffm:293333
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.293333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/293333/files/OrganicFarmPerfomanceMN2012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.293333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umcffm:293333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dcumnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.