IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278162.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Geographic Distribution Of Federal Funds In 1985

Author

Listed:
  • Dubin, Elliott J.

Abstract

Metropolitan counties received substantially higher levels of per capita Federal funding than nonmetropolitan counties in fiscal year 1985. The gap between metro and nonmetro funding increased slightly since fiscal year 1980 due to increases in defense spending. The metro-nonmetro differences in nondefense fund levels narrowed considerably during the first half of the 1980's. Metro and nonmetro counties differed in the composition of their funding in 1985. Metro counties received greater amounts of defense funding, while nonmetro counties depended more heavily on agricultural assistance, natural resource, and income transfer funds. Differences in the per capita level and composition of funding differed considerably among the various categories of nonmetro counties.

Suggested Citation

  • Dubin, Elliott J., 1989. "Geographic Distribution Of Federal Funds In 1985," Staff Reports 278162, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278162
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278162/files/ers-report-387.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eleanor H. Erdevig, 1986. "Federal funds flow no bargain for Midwest," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 10(Jan), pages 3-10.
    2. Reid, J. Norman & Hendler, Charles I. & Whitehead, Eleanor, 1982. "Federal Funds In 1979: Geographic Distribution and Recent Trends," Staff Reports 276731, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Reid, J. Norman & Whitehead, Eleanor, 1982. "Federal Funds in 1980: Geographic Distribution and Recent Trends," Staff Reports 289194, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elliott Dubin, 1991. "Distribution Of Federal Taxes And Expenditures: Urban Vs. Rural States," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 21(3), pages 291-309, Fall.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elliott Dubin, 1991. "Distribution Of Federal Taxes And Expenditures: Urban Vs. Rural States," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 21(3), pages 291-309, Fall.
    2. Barry Eichengreen, 1992. "Is Europe an Optimum Currency Area?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Silvio Borner & Herbert Grubel (ed.), The European Community after 1992, chapter 8, pages 138-161, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Fisher, Dennis U., 0. "Impact Of Services On Rural Communities," Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies, Farm Foundation.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial Economics; Political Economy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.