IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssb/154878.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cotton Ginning Charges, Harvesting Practices, and Selected Marketing Costs, 1993/94 Season

Author

Listed:
  • Glade Jr., Edward H.
  • Johnson, Mae Dean
  • Meyer, Leslie A.

Abstract

The average charge for saw-ginning and wrapping a 480-pound net-weight bale of cotton in the United States was $43.28 per bale during the 1993/94 season, compared with $42.50 in 1992/93. This increase reverses a 5-year decline in the I I U.S. average ginning charge. There were a total of 1,357 I active cotton gins operating in the 14 major cotton-producing States during 1993/94, compared with 1,383 the previous season. Charges for the primary warehousing services declined to $18.64 per bale for the 1993/94 season versus $19 per bale in 1992/93.

Suggested Citation

  • Glade Jr., Edward H. & Johnson, Mae Dean & Meyer, Leslie A., 1995. "Cotton Ginning Charges, Harvesting Practices, and Selected Marketing Costs, 1993/94 Season," Statistical Bulletin 154878, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssb:154878
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.154878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/154878/files/sb918.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.154878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mrill Ingram, 2002. "Producing the natural fiber naturally: Technological change and the US organic cotton industry," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 19(4), pages 325-336, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssb:154878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.