IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersrr/341823.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing Food Insecurity Among the U.S. Military and Civilian Adult Populations

Author

Listed:
  • Rabbitt, Matthew P.
  • Beymer, Matthew R.

Abstract

Readiness is a cornerstone of military service. Military readiness includes cognitive and physical abilities to train and execute missions. Previous studies among civilians demonstrate that food security is associated with cognitive function and body mass index. Therefore, food security is vital to maintaining military readiness. While no analyses have been conducted on the prevalence of food insecurity for a representative sample of the active duty U.S. military, studies of individual military installations have demonstrated food insecurity rates between 15 and 33 percent. The authors compared food insecurity among the U.S. military and civilian adult populations, using data from the 2018 and 2020 Status of Forces Survey of Active Duty Members and the Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement. A weighting procedure was used to ensure the military and civilian adult populations were demographically equivalent. The findings show that the prevalence of food insecurity was 25.3 percent among the military population compared with 10.1 percent among a demographically equivalent civilian adult population. A more severe form of food insecurity, very low food security, was estimated to be 10.5 percent of the military population in 2018 and 2020, compared with 3.6 percent of the comparable civilian adult population during this period. The findings demonstrate that the military population is at elevated risk for food insecurity and that food insecurity measures can be used to reliably construct measures of active duty service members’ food insecurity for monitoring and research purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Rabbitt, Matthew P. & Beymer, Matthew R., 2034. "Comparing Food Insecurity Among the U.S. Military and Civilian Adult Populations," Economic Research Report 341823, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersrr:341823
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.341823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/341823/files/err-331.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.341823?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersrr:341823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.