IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersmp/324162.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Impact of Discontinuing Farm Uses of Heptachlor

Author

Listed:
  • Delvo, Herman W.
  • Fox, Austin S.
  • Jenkins, Robert P.

Abstract

In 1971, U.S. farmers would have incurred additional costs of $2.1 million if farm uses of the insecticide heptachlor had been discontinued. Based on estimates of 1971 acreage treated with heptachlor, this aggregate loss would have included $1.2 million in additional costs for alternative insecticides and $0.9 million in yield losses. Added costs for alternative insecticides would have ranged from $1.55 to $1.73 an acre for corn, depending on whether corn rootworm or other soil insects were the problem. Tobacco producers would have had an added cost of $21,300 for alternative insecticides--$8,700 for field treatment and $12,600 for seedbed treatment. Seed treatment costs, primarily for corn, would have increased by $55,000. Total use of heptachlor would have decreased by 695,000 pounds if farm use had been discontinued. The increase in alternative insecticides would have ranged from 561,000 to 695,000 pounds, depending on which organophosphate or carbamate insecticide farmers had used in place of heptachlor.

Suggested Citation

  • Delvo, Herman W. & Fox, Austin S. & Jenkins, Robert P., 1973. "Economic Impact of Discontinuing Farm Uses of Heptachlor," Miscellaneous Publications 324162, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:324162
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.324162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/324162/files/ERS-509.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.324162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:324162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.