IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerser/307478.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Caustic Dry Peeling of Cling Peaches to Reduce Water Pollution: Its Economic Feasibility

Author

Listed:
  • Gray, Leo R.
  • Hart, Marcus R.

Abstract

The economic feasibility of a new caustic dry method of peeling cling peaches is examined. The dry-peel method, developed as an alternative to the currently used wet-peel method, is designed to reduce the pollution in fruit canneries' wastewaters. By using the dry-peel method instead of the wet-peel method, a cling pea cannery would generate less wastewater and the pollution level of the water would be lower. The cannery would realize savings in fresh water costs. Savings in wastewater disposal costs would vary, depending on whether wastewater service charges are based partially on the water's biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) or only on the volume of wastewater discharged. Labor requirements would probably not increase. New equipment costs could be largely offset if a replacement cost is allocated for the old wet-peel equipment. Solid waste disposal costs would increase because some of the peeling loss would be recovered as a solid waste rather than being discharged into the wastewater stream. Such added costs would be at least partially offset, however, for canneries located in areas where BOD is a factor in computation of wastewater service charges.

Suggested Citation

  • Gray, Leo R. & Hart, Marcus R., 1972. "Caustic Dry Peeling of Cling Peaches to Reduce Water Pollution: Its Economic Feasibility," Agricultural Economic Reports 307478, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:307478
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.307478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/307478/files/aer234.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.307478?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richardson, L. R., 1959. "Factors in Developing Grades and Standards for Blackstrap Molasses for Feed," Marketing Research Reports 310997, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Unknown, 1973. "U.S. agriculture - Environmental controls and economics," Agricultural Outlook Forum Archive 1923 - 1997 336836, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:307478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.