IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/313288.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sedimentation as a Measure of Wheat Quality, 1963 Crop

Author

Listed:
  • Zeleny, Lawrence
  • Laubis, Robert E.
  • Doty, James M.

Abstract

Repot Summary: Analysis of 1801 samples of 1963-crop hard red winter and hard red spring wheat showed the sedimentation value to be more highly correlated with bread-baking quality as measured by the Doty "flour evaluation score” in most of the 33 areas of production than were either the protein content or any of the farinogram characteristics. Protein content in most areas was more highly correlated with bread-loaf volume than were either the sedimentation value or any of the farinogram characteristics. Bread-loaf volume, however , is considered to be only one of the important factors of quality included in determining the flour evaluation score, and therefore to be less reliable than flour evaluation score as an index of bread-baking quality. In most areas sedimentation was also correlated more highly than was protein content with mixing time, mixing tolerance, MTI value, and valorimeter value. Essentially the same relationships were found among sedimentation, protein, farinogram characteristics, and bread-baking quality when the 1962 and 1963 crop data were combined.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeleny, Lawrence & Laubis, Robert E. & Doty, James M., 1964. "Sedimentation as a Measure of Wheat Quality, 1963 Crop," Marketing Research Reports 313288, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313288
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.313288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/313288/files/mrr680.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.313288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.