IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/312169.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Women's Attitudes Toward Cotton and Other Fibers Used in Wearing Apparel

Author

Listed:
  • Skelly, Florence
  • Goldberg, Robert
  • Clayton, L. Yvonne

Abstract

Excerpts from the report: In recent years, consumption of manmade fibers as a proportion of total fiber consumption in the United States has increased considerably. This has made it necessary to update existing evaluations of markets for natural fibers as compared with synthetic fibers. Persons interested in improving natural fibers and in maintaining or increasing their use need information on changing consumer attitudes. The major purpose of this study is to provide information on the beliefs and attitudes of women about cotton and its competitors in the clothing they wear for warm weather. Having access to such information, those concerned with cotton production and manufacture can direct their laboratory research and public information efforts more closely toward strengthening their position with consumers. A sample of women between 18 and 65 years of age living in private households in the United States was selected by the area probability method. A total of 2,909 women were interviewed in person in their homes during October and November 1965. A more detailed discussion of the sample may be found in the appendix.

Suggested Citation

  • Skelly, Florence & Goldberg, Robert & Clayton, L. Yvonne, 1968. "Women's Attitudes Toward Cotton and Other Fibers Used in Wearing Apparel," Marketing Research Reports 312169, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:312169
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.312169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/312169/files/mrr820.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.312169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:312169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.