IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/312127.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quality of Graded Eggs at Four Grading Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Mercuri, Arthur J.
  • Thomson, James E.
  • Davis, Lyle L.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report: Because eggs which enter present-day market channels are generally higher and more uniform in quality than those marketed a few decades ago, the necessity of candling each egg individually to assign grades to consumer dozen-egg lots has been questioned. A proposed substitute is to grade by objectively measuring the quality of a statistical sample of eggs produced and handled under conditions which minimize the deterioration of initial quality. A plan employing this approach has recently been inaugurated on a voluntary basis by the U. S. Department of Agriculture. Determination of interior quality on such a basis, together with the use of multiple candling to detect and reject defective eggs, has proved to be effective. Few data are available regarding the effectiveness of present-day commercial grading, by candling, of eggs received directly from farms; that is, "fresh" eggs. Such information is of value to producers, packers, and consumers of shell eggs, to government officials concerned with promulgation of standards of egg quality, and to researchers involved in developing improved egg grading techniques. This research project was designed to provide such information.

Suggested Citation

  • Mercuri, Arthur J. & Thomson, James E. & Davis, Lyle L., 1962. "Quality of Graded Eggs at Four Grading Plants," Marketing Research Reports 312127, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:312127
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.312127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/312127/files/mrr521.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.312127?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:312127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.