Choice Task Complexity and Decision Strategy Selection
AbstractThe psychology, the marketing consumer behavior and, to a much smaller extent, the economics literature have long reported evidence that decision makers utilize different decision strategies depending upon many factors (person-specific, task-specific, etc.). Such observations have generally failed to affect the specification of choice models in commercial practice and academic research, both of which still tend to assume an utility maximizing, full information, indefatigable decision maker. This is true whether the models deal with Stated Preference (SP - from hypothetical elicitations) or Revealed Preference (RP - from actual market decisions) choice data. This paper, which deals only with SP data, addresses the following issues: (1) does task complexity affect decision strategy selection in experimental choice tasks? (2) does the cumulative cognitive burden created by multiple choice scenarios done in sequence affect the selection of decision strategy by respondents? Our contribution is two-fold: (1) we introduce decision strategy selection as an explicit factor in aggregate choice models via the mechanism of latent classes, which are assumed to be a function of task complexity; (2) we demonstrate, for a particular set of data, that within the scope of an SP choice task, respondents did indeed make use of multiple decision strategies as choice set complexity changed and as the SP task progressed. We examine the import of our findings to current practice, model interpretation and future research needs.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology in its series Staff Paper Series with number 24101.
Date of creation: 1997
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: 515 General Services Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AlbertaT6G 2H1
Phone: (780) 492-4225
Fax: (780) 492-0268
Web page: http://www.rees.ualberta.ca/
More information through EDIRC
Institutional and Behavioral Economics;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Strand.J., 2001.
"Public- and private-good values of statistical lives : results from a combined choice-experiment and contingent-valuation survey,"
31/2001, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
- Strand, Jon, 2009. "Public- and private-good values of statistical lives Results from a combined choice-experiment and contingent-valuation survey," HERO On line Working Paper Series 2002:2, Oslo University, Health Economics Research Programme.
- Hasler, Berit & Lundhede, Thomas, 2005. "Are Agricultural Measures for Groundwater Protection Beneficial When Compared to Purification of Polluted Groundwater?," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24587, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
- Kjartan Sælensminde, 2002. "The Impact of Choice Inconsistencies in Stated Choice Studies," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 23(4), pages 403-420, December.
- Hu, Wuyang & Adamowicz, Wiktor L. & Veeman, Michele M., 2004. "Decomposing Unobserved Choice Variability In The Presence Of Consumers' Taste Heterogeneity," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19954, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.