IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/siubul/47547.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Questionable Necessity Of Changing Maize Intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Jancsok, Zsuzsanna
  • Kato, Norbert
  • Nogradi, J.
  • Cseke, Z.

Abstract

The EU took clear steps to suppress and abandon the intervention of maize in 2006. Originally the measure should have been revised in the course of the “Health Check”. But the European Commission (EC) rendered the minimal quality requirement for maize stricter in the intervention period starting 1 November 2006. Later the EC proposed to finish the intervention of maize. According to that decision the intervention of maize exists in the marketing year of 2007/08 and 2008/09 with a quantity limitation but it finishes in the marketing year of 2009/10. The EC argues for the abandonment of maize intervention, because, intervention stocks of cereals have increased significantly after the accession of the 10 new member states (EU-10), and the balance of the maize market is at risk. This measure is aimed to get back the intervention to its original purpose, as a safety net. We prove in this study that the intervention stock of cereal has not significantly increased after the enlargement in 2004 and it is not a reason for finishing maize intervention. The intervention stock of maize has increased since 2004 but not so significantly that it could be a reason for the abandonment of maize intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Jancsok, Zsuzsanna & Kato, Norbert & Nogradi, J. & Cseke, Z., 2008. "The Questionable Necessity Of Changing Maize Intervention," Bulletin of the Szent Istvan University 47547, Szent Istvan University, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:siubul:47547
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.47547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/47547/files/23jancsok.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.47547?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:siubul:47547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sziu.hu/Dear_Reader .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.