IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saea18/266717.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating the Overall Economic Loss to the South Carolina Peach Industry due to the March 2017 Freeze

Author

Listed:
  • White, Cody
  • Vassalos, Michael
  • Smith, Nathan

Abstract

South Carolina is the 2nd largest peach producing state in the United States, which in turn makes the peach industry a major contributor to the state’s economy ranking 8th in production value in 2016. According to the South Carolina Department of Agriculture (SCDA), the peach industry annually has up to a $300 million impact to the South Carolina economy and has an annual value of nearly $70 million. An unseasonably warm winter at the beginning of 2017 produced an early bloom for the peach crop causing severe damage when record low temperatures occurred in March. Original estimations from the SCDA indicated that about 85-90% of the state’s peach crop was destroyed due to the freeze. The objective of the paper is to determine the economic impact that occurred to the South Carolina peach industry and to the state’s economy due to the freeze. In particular, losses will be examined in both consumer and producer surplus. The data is obtained from farmers’ responses to surveys and from the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. Also, the regional economic analysis from the loss is determined using IMPLAN input-output models.

Suggested Citation

  • White, Cody & Vassalos, Michael & Smith, Nathan, 2018. "Estimating the Overall Economic Loss to the South Carolina Peach Industry due to the March 2017 Freeze," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266717, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:saea18:266717
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.266717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266717/files/SAEAPeachLoss.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266717/files/SAEAPeachLoss.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.266717?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McKissick, John C. & Kane, Sharon P., 2011. "Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Economic Losses by Georgia Fruit and Vegetable Producers, Spring 2011," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 29(2).
    2. Diersen, Matthew A. & Taylor, Gary, 2003. "Examining Economic Impact And Recovery In South Dakota From The 2002 Drought," Economics Staff Papers 32028, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tianyuan Luo & Cesar L Escalante, 2017. "US farm workers: What drives their job retention and work time allocation decisions?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(2), pages 270-293, June.
    2. Bampasidou, Maria & Salassi, Michael E., 2019. "Agricultural Labor Trends: Considerations for Farm Operators and Managers," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2019.
    3. Burton C. English & S. Aaron Smith & R. Jamey Menard & David W. Hughes & Michael Gunderson, 2021. "Estimated Economic Impacts of the 2019 Midwest Floods," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 431-448, October.
    4. Escalante, Cesar L. & Williams, Odeidra & Rusiana, Hofner, 2019. "Costly Foreign Farm Replacement Workers and the Need for H-2A Reforms," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2019.
    5. Jaume Freire-González & Christopher A. Decker & Jim W. Hall, 2017. "A Scenario-Based Framework for Assessing the Economic Impacts of Potential Droughts," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(04), pages 1-27, October.
    6. K. Jenkins, 2013. "Indirect economic losses of drought under future projections of climate change: a case study for Spain," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(3), pages 1967-1986, December.
    7. Rodgers, Aaron & Morgan, Kimberly L. & Harri, Ardian, 2017. "Technology Adoption and Risk Preferences: The Case of Machine Harvesting by Southeastern Blueberry Producers," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 48(2), July.
    8. Genti Kostandini & Elton Mykerezi & Cesar Escalante, 2014. "The Impact of Immigration Enforcement on the U.S. Farming Sector," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(1), pages 172-192.
    9. Stegelin, Forrest E. & Esalante, Cesar L & Fonsah, Esendugue Greg & Kightlinger, Keith D., 2011. "Farm and Agribusiness Labor: Spotlight on Georgia’s Produce Industry," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 29(2).
    10. Kim, Taeyoon & Kenkel, Philip L., 2008. "The Impact of Drought on Grain Handling Firms," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6844, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy; Community/Rural/Urban Development;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saea18:266717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.