IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saea17/252765.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Examining the use of group projects in agribusiness courses to enrich overall student learning

Author

Listed:
  • Tewari, Rachna
  • Luitel, Kishor
  • Mehlhorn, Joey
  • Pruitt, J. Ross
  • Parrott, Scott
  • Crews Garcia, Jessica

Abstract

A clear majority of agribusiness programs require their graduates to successfully complete relevant coursework in both quantitative and theoretical areas. Instructors often make use of group projects to promote student participation, inculcate team working skills, and to enhance students’ soft skills for service related jobs in the agricultural industry. In these projects, student groups work on project milestones followed by instructor feedback for improvement. Project completion is marked by student teams’ engagement in interactive group activities such as presentations, debates, and sales pitches. The objective of this study is to evaluate the use of group projects for enhancing student learning in various agribusiness courses using an online survey tool. It is observed that students’ performance and the overall learning experience is enhanced using group work in agribusiness courses. Results indicate that students find value in these interactive projects, which facilitates a higher level of learning. Students also feel confident about their soft skills, and can better enunciate and express their viewpoints among an audience.

Suggested Citation

  • Tewari, Rachna & Luitel, Kishor & Mehlhorn, Joey & Pruitt, J. Ross & Parrott, Scott & Crews Garcia, Jessica, 2017. "Examining the use of group projects in agribusiness courses to enrich overall student learning," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252765, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:saea17:252765
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.252765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/252765/files/SAEA_2017%20final%201-17-17.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.252765?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shaohua (Carolyn) Mu & Devi R. Gnyawali, 2003. "Developing Synergistic Knowledge in Student Groups," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(6), pages 689-711, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi-Ching Huang & Hsin-Yi Cyndi Huang, 2019. "A Case Study of Project-based English Learning Experience in a Simulated Business Context," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Chieh-Peng Lin & Meng-Keng Tsai, 2020. "Strengthening long-term job performance: The moderating roles of sense of responsibility and leader’s support," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(1), pages 134-152, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saea17:252765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.