IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nzar16/260809.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysing the implications of increased nitrogen application on greenhouse gas emissions and productivity of New Zealand sheep and beef farms

Author

Listed:
  • Upton, S T

Abstract

New Zealand’s goal to double agricultural exports as well as meet Kyoto protocol commitments is a challenge. New Zealand sheep and beef farmers have been advised that applying more nitrogen fertiliser is the cheapest way to boost productivity. However, an increase in nitrogen fertiliser application results in greenhouse gas emissions increasing. This study analysed the implications of increased nitrogen fertiliser application on productivity and greenhouse gas emissions for New Zealand sheep and beef farms. Three scenarios were modelled to use the additional pasture production achieved from the different rates of nitrogen fertiliser and compared with a base model sheep and beef farm. These scenarios were (1) better feeding livestock to increase end live weight, (2) increasing stocking rate and (3) better feeding livestock to reduce the number of grazing days. The model farm was based on weighted average of all sheep and beef farms in New Zealand (Class 9). Simulations were then run with the different rates of nitrogen fertiliser ranging from 20 to 100kgN/ha/yr through each scenario. Consistent with the hypotheses, the efficiency of utilisation of extra grass production is an important determinant of the ratio of product output to GHG emissions. For scenario 1 and 2, productivity increased with the ratio of profit to kg of GHG emissions increasing. In scenario 1, the profit per kg of GHG emissions increased 27% in simulation 1 from the base model farm. This occurred when nitrogen fertiliser was increased to 20 kg/N/ha/yr from 5.6 kg/N/ha/yr. The ratio increased 0.6% for scenario 2 for the same change in nitrogen fertiliser. In scenario 3, the ratio of profit to kg of GHG emissions decreased 9% for the same change in nitrogen fertiliser. In all scenarios, GHG emissions increased. When N fertiliser is increased, productivity increased, greenhouse gas emissions could not be reduced and the proposed emissions trading scheme will have little impact on profitability. Strategic use of N could improve hill-country resilience. With an increase in strategic N fertiliser application, livestock can be better fed; thus, increased live weight and reducing the number of grazing days.

Suggested Citation

  • Upton, S T, 2016. "Analysing the implications of increased nitrogen application on greenhouse gas emissions and productivity of New Zealand sheep and beef farms," 2016 Conference, August 25-26, Nelson, New Zealand 260809, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:nzar16:260809
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.260809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/260809/files/Upton%202016.%20Analysing%20the%20implications%20of%20increased%20nitrogen%20on%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20and%20productivity.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/260809/files/Upton%202016.%20Analysing%20the%20implications%20of%20increased%20nitrogen%20on%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20and%20productivity.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.260809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural Finance; Environmental Economics and Policy; Livestock Production/Industries;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nzar16:260809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nzareea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.