IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nswprr/280783.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Economic Effects of Using Heterozygotes for a Non-functional Myostatin Mutation within a Commercial Beef Production System

Author

Listed:
  • Alford, Andrew R.
  • McKiernan, William A.
  • Cafe, Linda M.
  • Greenwood, Paul L.
  • Griffith, Garry R.

Abstract

The application of molecular genetics to improve meat yield in beef carcases has generated global interest in recent years. Myostatin has been identified as a negative regulator of skeletal muscle mass. Muscular hypertrophy or “double muscling” in cattle has been attributed to naturally occurring mutations in the bovine myostatin gene that result in “inactive” or “non-functional” myostatin. The objective of this study is to take the findings of some recent Beef CRC experimental results relating to selection for the non-functional myostatin mutation, and examine the profitability implications of possible commercial application in the Australian beef industry. A herd-level economic analysis was undertaken using Beef-N-Omics. Inputs included herd costs and returns for a representative selfreplacing beef herd turning off young cattle, as published by the Industry & Investment NSW. Other inputs included pasture growth data for a representative good quality pasture system in the North-west of NSW, and herd production data based on the experimental results. Four scenarios were examined based on different combinations of herd structure and premiums available for muscle score. In a self-replacing system (with a $50 per female cost for the genetic screening test), the increase in gross margin over the base herd was 0.5 per cent ($3 per breeding cow or $2 per ha) when there was a 1 muscle score increase in the average muscle score of the heterozygous progeny. For an increase of 2 muscle scores in the progeny, the improvement in the gross margin was 4.9 per cent ($27 per breeding cow or $13 per ha). In the scenarios where a terminal sire system was applied to utilise the myostatin mutation, the economic benefits are potentially greater. In the case of a 1 unit increase in muscle score over the base herd, a 6.1 per cent increase in the gross margin was achieved ($34 per breeding cow or $17 per ha). If a 2 unit increase in muscle score was obtained a potential 17.7 per cent increase in the gross margin over the based herd was obtained ($96 per breeding cow or $48 per ha).

Suggested Citation

  • Alford, Andrew R. & McKiernan, William A. & Cafe, Linda M. & Greenwood, Paul L. & Griffith, Garry R., 2009. "The Economic Effects of Using Heterozygotes for a Non-functional Myostatin Mutation within a Commercial Beef Production System," Research Reports 280783, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:nswprr:280783
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.280783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/280783/files/ERR42.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.280783?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nswprr:280783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aenswau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.