IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr04/208227.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Evaluation of Transportation Needs of the Disadvantaged in North Dakota

Author

Listed:
  • Hegland, Gary
  • Hough, Jill

Abstract

The disadvantaged population have barriers to a normal lifestyle. Mobility is one of these barriers. Approximately 15.4 percent of North Dakota’s population is disadvantaged. These individuals live in the metropolitan areas and in the rural, low-population-density counties, which have limited transportation. The Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute (UGPTI) developed a survey to identify the transportation needs of the disadvantaged population and measure how those needs are being met. The UGPTI worked with four Centers for Independent Living that serve the state of North Dakota. Each of the centers selected a random sample of their clients and mailed the survey to them. The results of the study are based on a 21 percent response rate. Results showed that more people would use transit if it were available to them. Almost 60 percent of the disadvantaged use transit either daily or weekly, and the majority perceived they rode less than five miles per trip. Most respondents use transit for medical appointments and shopping. The respondents indicated they primarily use demand-response transit, which usually is provided by taxi, senior bus, and paratransit. Riders think the drivers are well-trained to accommodate their needs and times at bus stops are adequate. The weekend and holiday hours of services were the most inadequate followed by scheduling and number of trips provided. This study found that a higher percentage of North Dakota disadvantaged reported problems with transportation than the national average.

Suggested Citation

  • Hegland, Gary & Hough, Jill, 2005. "An Evaluation of Transportation Needs of the Disadvantaged in North Dakota," 45th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Evanston, Illinois, March 21-23, 2004 208227, Transportation Research Forum.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr04:208227
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.208227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/208227/files/2004_Disadvantaged_paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.208227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr04:208227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://trforum.org/annual-forum/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.