IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nddmrs/51163.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparison of Two Angler Data Collection Methods In North Dakota

Author

Listed:
  • Baltezore, James F.
  • Leitch, Jay A.
  • Vachal, Shawn R.

Abstract

North Dakota's recreational fishing industry is an important part of the state's economic base. Resident and nonresident anglers spent nearly $260 million dollars on fishing-related activities in the state in 1990 (Baltezore and Leitch 1992). Management of a resource that generates this amount of economic activity requires accurate and periodic information. Management uses information in at least two ways. Information is initially used to make a decision. Once a decision is made, additional information is collected to assess the results or outcomes of that decision. In effect, information is used to make a decision and monitor changes resulting from that decision (Kerestes and Leitch 1983). Periodic information is needed to monitor the outcomes of management's decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Baltezore, James F. & Leitch, Jay A. & Vachal, Shawn R., 1994. "Comparison of Two Angler Data Collection Methods In North Dakota," Agricultural Economics Miscellaneous Reports 51163, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:nddmrs:51163
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.51163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/51163/files/No.173.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.51163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nddmrs:51163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dandsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.