IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nddaer/23264.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Industrial Hemp As An Alternative Crop In North Dakota

Author

Listed:
  • Kraenzel, David G.
  • Petry, Timothy A.
  • Nelson, Bill
  • Anderson, Marshall J.
  • Mathern, Dustin
  • Todd, Robert

Abstract

This report is in response to a national and state interest in the potential benefits of industrial hemp as an alternative crop. Industrial hemp has many uses which can be categorized into nine submarkets. North Dakota may have a comparative advantage in producing industrial hemp seed for oil because of the multi-oil processing facility in Carrington (AgGrow Oils) and the established infrastructure. Industrial hemp is currently legally produced in 22 countries with Canada being the closest and is recognized as a legal and legitimate crop in both the NAFTA and GATT agreements. The main obstacles for legalization of industrial hemp appear to be 1) law enforcement officials are concerned about the regulation, 2) no domestic facilities currently exist to process hemp stalks, although Canada will have such facilities shortly, 3) there is a lack of current production and processing technology, and 4) lack of research on the production potential and quality aspects of the crop. Since very little is known about the potential yield and quality of industrial hemp fiber and seed that would be produced in North Dakota, it is recommended that controlled experimental production and processing be allowed. Necessary baseline production, processing, and marketing data could be collected and analyzed, and law enforcement concerns could also be addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Kraenzel, David G. & Petry, Timothy A. & Nelson, Bill & Anderson, Marshall J. & Mathern, Dustin & Todd, Robert, 1998. "Industrial Hemp As An Alternative Crop In North Dakota," Agricultural Economics Reports 23264, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:nddaer:23264
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.23264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23264/files/aer402.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.23264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Usda, 2000. "Industrial Hemp in the United States: Status and Market Potential," Staff Reports 278840, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. T. RANDALL FORTENBERY & Michael Bennett, 2001. "Is Industrial Hemp Worth Further Study in the US? A Survey of the Literature," Wisconsin-Madison Agricultural and Applied Economics Staff Papers 443, Wisconsin-Madison Agricultural and Applied Economics Department.
    3. T. Randall Fortenbery & Michael Bennett, 2004. "Opportunities for Commercial Hemp Production," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 97-117.
    4. Jane Kolodinsky & Hannah Lacasse & Katherine Gallagher, 2020. "Making Hemp Choices: Evidence from Vermont," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Beatrice Dingha & Leah Sandler & Arnab Bhowmik & Clement Akotsen-Mensah & Louis Jackai & Kevin Gibson & Ronald Turco, 2019. "Industrial Hemp Knowledge and Interest among North Carolina Organic Farmers in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Kim, GwanSeon & Mark, Tyler, 2018. "Who are Consuming Hemp Products in the U.S.? Evidence from Nielsen Homescan Data," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266671, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Production Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nddaer:23264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dandsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.