Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Financial Characteristics of North Dakota Farms 2002-2011

Contents:

Author Info

  • Swenson, Andrew L.
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The performance of over 500 North Dakota farms, 2002-2011, is summarized using 16 financial measures. Farms are categorized by geographic region, farm type, farm size, gross cash sales, farm tenure, net farm income, debt-to-asset, and age of farmer to analyze relationships between financial performance and farm characteristics. Five-year averages, 2006-2010, are also presented. In 2011, median and average acreage per farm was 1,968 and 2,619, respectively. Median and average cash farm revenue was $569,268 and $757,134, respectively. Over 70% of farms were crop farms and 54 percent of farms had gross sales exceeding $500,000. Median age of farm operators was 47. Median net farm income in 2011 was $144,414, second highest in the past 10 years, down from $174,010 in 2010. Financial measures for 2011, 2010, 2008 and 2007 were much superior to those in other years for the 2002-2011 period. The Red River Valley and crop farms typically had stronger profitability, solvency, and repayment capacity from 2002 to 2011 than other regions and farm types, respectively. Exceptions were 2007 and 2009 when the north central region had the best regional performance and 2005 when the south central region and livestock farms had better performance. The 2011 median net farm income was $185,822 for crop farms and $61,244 for livestock farms. Farms with sales less than $500,000 were over three times as likely to have debt-to-asset higher than 70 percent as farms with sales greater than $500,000. Farms that own some crop land, but less than 40 percent of the land they operate were more likely to be crop farms, farm more acreage, have larger sales, and be more profitable. As expected, solvency and percent of crop land owned increased with farmer age. Median net farm income as a percent of gross revenue was the highest of the decade in 2010, 33.1 percent, and the lowest in 2009, 13.4 percent. It was 27.5 percent in 2010, 24 percent in 2008 and 30.6 percent in 2007 after ranging from 22.4 to 14 percent between 2002 and 2006

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/134452
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics in its series Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report with number 134452.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: Sep 2012
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:134452

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: PO Box 5636, Fargo, ND 58105-5636
    Phone: (701) 231-7441
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.ext.nodak.edu/homepages/aedept/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Farm financial management; farm management; farm income; liquidity; solvency; profitability; repayment capacity; financial efficiency; financial benchmarks; tenure; North Dakota.; Farm Management; Financial Economics;

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:134452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.