Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Results of the North Dakota Land Valuation Model for the 2012 Agricultural Real Estate Assessment

Contents:

Author Info

  • Aakre, Dwight G.
  • Haugen, Ronald H.
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    This report summarizes the 2012 results of the North Dakota Land Valuation Model. The model is used annually to estimate average land values by county, based on the value of production from cropland and non-cropland. The county land values developed from this procedure form the basis for the 2012 valuation of agricultural land for real estate tax assessment. The average value for all agricultural land in a county from this analysis is multiplied by the total acres of agricultural land on the county abstract to determine each county’s total agricultural land value for taxation purposes. The State Board of Equalization compares this value with the total value assessed to agricultural property in each county. The State Board of Equalization gave counties the authority to assess a total value of agricultural property no less than 90.0 percent of this value for 2012. The average value per acre of all agricultural land in North Dakota increased by 29.14 percent from 2011 to 2012 based on the value of production. Cropland value increased by 30.45 percent, and non-cropland value increased by 23.0 percent. The formula capitalization rate was 5.864 percent. This was the first year the formula capitalization rate was used since 2002. The capitalization rate used for all years from 2003 through 2011 was the minimum rate set by the Legislature. The legislation setting a minimum capitalization rate expired after the 2011 tax year. The increase in the values for cropland, non-cropland and all agricultural land was due to the decrease in the capitalization rate and the increased value of crop production. The value of production for most counties has been considerably higher since 2007 than prior years. This increase in value of production is a combination of increased yields, higher prices and a change in cropping mix. The change in crop revenue impacted land values from an increase of 5.9 percent at the low end to over 17.0 percent at the high end. The capitalization rate change increased land valuations by 26.19 percent in all counties; while the cost of production index decreased land values in all counties by 5.41 percent. Changes in market value are included for comparison. Market value data are from the annual County Rents and Values survey conducted by North Dakota Agricultural Statistics Service.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/128042
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics in its series Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report with number 128042.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: May 2012
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:128042

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: PO Box 5636, Fargo, ND 58105-5636
    Phone: (701) 231-7441
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.ext.nodak.edu/homepages/aedept/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Land valuation; real estate assessment; agricultural land; Farm Management; Land Economics/Use;

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:128042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.