IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndappb/228959.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

United States and Canadian Agricultural Herbicide Costs: 2003 Update

Author

Listed:
  • Taylor, Richard D.
  • Gray, James A.

Abstract

Herbicide prices differ between Canada and the United States. Price disparities may be symptoms of the different pesticide regulatory systems between the two countries. The price diferences may be due to the size of the respective pesticide markets or different business environments. Traditional economic theory states that price is determined by supply and demand. For the prices to remain different, the two markets must be segregated by some barrier. If not, arbitrage will occur and eliminate the price differences. An international border with trade restriction provides an excellent barrier. The price difference between the two countries costs North Dakota producers over $20 million annually. Higher herbicide costs in North Dakota raised total pesticide expenditures about 8.3% and total crop expenses by 2.3% in 2002. Differences in the economic structure of the two countries provide the incentive for different prices, but market segregation is required for successful price discrimination. Therefore, to eliminate price disparities, the U.S. and Canadian herbicides markets must be de-segmented.

Suggested Citation

  • Taylor, Richard D. & Gray, James A., 2003. "United States and Canadian Agricultural Herbicide Costs: 2003 Update," Agricultural Policy Briefs 228959, North Dakota State University, Center for Agricultural Policy and Trade Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndappb:228959
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.228959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/228959/files/agecon-ndsu-378-784-c45-a-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.228959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Taylor, Richard & Koo, Won W. & Mattson, Jeremy, 2005. "Economic Analysis of the Free Trade of Agricultural Chemicals Between the United States and Canada," Agricultural Policy Briefs 228972, North Dakota State University, Center for Agricultural Policy and Trade Studies.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndappb:228959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/candsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.