IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ncrarc/260641.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Extension: An Antiquated Educational System?

Author

Listed:
  • Knutson, Ronald D.

Abstract

In a recent discussion by three fellows of the American Agricultural Economics Association it was observed that if the Land-Grant University System were to be created today there would be no extension component. For those involved in the discussion this was not a matter of controversy--it was fact! That is a sobering thought for one who has committed a major share of his professional career to extension education. Is extension an antiquated system? The goal of extension as a public tool for accomplishing technology transfer is not antiquated. That need is greater than ever. If not effectively dealt with there is substantial evidence that the family farm will be in an increasingly difficult competitive position. While the basic goal of extension may not be antiquated, major changes in how extension is organized and conducts its business will be required. The purpose of this paper is to explain the basis for this concern. In the process some of the major strengths, weaknesses, and challenges to extension will be pointed out.

Suggested Citation

  • Knutson, Ronald D., 1985. "Extension: An Antiquated Educational System?," North Central Region Archives 260641, North Central Region - North Central Cooperative Extension Association (NCCEA).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ncrarc:260641
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.260641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/260641/files/02-Knutson.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.260641?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ncrarc:260641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nccea.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.