IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/mpaper/18702.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessment By Midwestern Agricultural Firms Of Doing Business In China And India

Author

Listed:
  • Agarwal, Sanjeev

Abstract

China and India are two of the world's biggest countries and potentially large markets for U.S. agricultural products. This study reports the assessment by midwestern agricultural firms of doing business in the two countries. The data, collected by mail questionnaire, suggests that China posed less of a problem than did India with respect to economic and market conditions, tariff and investment barriers, and physical and cultural barriers. On the other hand, India posed less of a problem than did China with respect to language, protection of property rights, and the legal system. Firms already doing business in these countries had more favorable comments than those with no previous experience. The study also reports results of telephone interviews with selected firms. These conversations provide a more personal account of challenges faced by firms that are testing markets in the two countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Agarwal, Sanjeev, 2002. "Assessment By Midwestern Agricultural Firms Of Doing Business In China And India," MATRIC Working Paper Series 18702, Iowa State University, Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:mpaper:18702
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.18702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/18702/files/wp020006.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.18702?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:mpaper:18702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.