Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Financial Analysis Of Tractor Purchase Decision In South Sulawesi, Indonesia: A Computer Spreadsheet Template

Contents:

Author Info

  • Maamun, Muhamad Yusuf
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Although most of the rice area in Indonesia is still prepared manually, since the early 1980s the government has promoted tractors for land preparation through subsidized loans. This has increased capital investment in agriculture; and for the farmers, the cost of owning and operating tractor has become an important part of farm costs. By the late 1980s, a rapid increase in the number of tractors intensified competition, reducing capacity utilization below an economically viable level. Thus, many tractor owners defaulted on their loans. This study investigates the financial profitability of tractor ownership in South Sulawesi, using a computer spreadsheet. The analysis uses input and output data (technical coefficient) collected by the Consequences of Mechanization Project in South Sulawesi in 1980-81, but introduces 1990 costs and prices to assess profitability under current conditions. The results showed that in 1980, tractors were unprofitable, as indicated by a B-C ratio of 0.87. In 1990, with the 1990 prices applied to the 1975-79 tractor capacity utilization, owners obtained positive net return (as indicated by a B-C ratio of 1.13, an IRR of 27% and a NPV of Rp 1,896,000) when the official contract rates was maintained. Sensitivity analysis showed that changes in critical variables, such as tractor price, contract rates, and interest level result in large changes in B-C ratio, NPV, and IRR. Increasing the initial tractor purchase price by 10%, decreased the B-C ratio to 1.07 (-5%), NPV to Rp 1,246,000 (34%) and IRR to 23% (-15%). Similarly, reducing the contract rate by 20 percent, reduce the B-C ratio to 0.9 (-20%), NPV to Rp -879,000 (146%) and IRR to 6.8% (-75%). In addition, increasing the interest rate from 15% to 30%, reduce the B-C ratio to 0.9 (-15%) and NPV to Rp461,000 (-76%). These results indicate the sensitivity of tractor profitability to parameters controlled by government (subsidized interest rate). Thus, while tractor ownership is certainly profitable, the profitability of future purchasers will depend on government policies at the time of purchase, government willingness to maintain a high contract rate, and farmers willingness to pay this rate.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/11212
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics in its series Graduate Research Masters Degree Plan B Papers with number 11212.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 1991
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ags:midagr:11212

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Justin S. Morrill Hall of Agriculture, 446 West Circle Dr., Rm 202, East Lansing, MI 48824-1039
    Phone: (517) 355-4563
    Fax: (517) 432-1800
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.aec.msu.edu/agecon/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Agricultural Finance; Farm Management;

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:midagr:11212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.