This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Potential Of Canola In Michigan

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Adhikari, Bishwa Bhakta
Abstract

This study consists of four different aspects of canola in Michigan with special emphasis on northern Michigan. The economic feasibility of canola as an alternative cash crop, potential canola growing area, feasibility of establishing canola processing plant(s) in northern Michigan and the canola marketing situation in Michigan were appraised. Secondary data, previous research results, key informant interviews, informal visits, expert opinions and survey data were used to study these aspects of canola. Review of past agronomic research results showed that canola can successfully be grown in various part of Michigan, including northern Michigan. Break-even analysis of canola with other alternative crops like wheat, corn, oats and soybeans suggested that canola can be more profitable than these crops whereas it cannot compete with kidney beans, dry beans and potatoes. Key informant surveys revealed that out of 598,000 acres of cultivated land in Northern Michigan, approximately 10,000 acres would be shifted to growing canola immediately, under the assumption of no marketing problems. The area would be sufficient for supplying canola to run two small to medium scale processing plants at full capacity. The economic feasibility of establishing canola processing plants has been evaluated in depth. Net present value (NPV) and internal rates (IRR) of return of proposed operations are encouraging. Various possible scenarios have been analyzed and it is concluded that canola processing has potential, particularly in northern Michigan. The case studies with grain elevators showed that canola handling might be profitable and that there is good potential for canola in Michigan. The major bottleneck in this sector is the lack of processing facilities in Michigan. Farmers are presently reluctant to grow canola due to perceived difficulties in marketing. Grain elevators are not handling canola at present time because of the very small volume of production. All of the respondents believed that the development of canola processing plant(s) or a strong marketing chain is necessary to stimulate the canola sub-sector in Michigan.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/11051
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics in its series Graduate Research Masters Degree Plan B Papers with number 11051.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 1996
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ags:midagr:11051

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 202 Agriculture Hall, East Lansing MI 48824-1039
Phone: (517) 355-4563
Fax: (517) 432-1800
Email:
Web page: http://www.aec.msu.edu/agecon/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (AgEcon Search).

Related research
Keywords: Crop Production/Industries;

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Data contributors to RePEc receive monthly emails with details about downloads and abstract views of their works.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-26.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.