IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/jhimwp/266397.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Status quo der Umsetzung von Naturschutz im Wald gegen Entgelt in Deutschland. Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Forstbetrieben

Author

Listed:
  • Kownatzki, Dierk
  • Blomberg, Moritz von
  • Demant, Laura
  • Lutter, Carina
  • Meyer, Peter
  • Möhring, Bernhard
  • Paschke, Marian
  • Seintsch, Björn
  • Selzer, Anne M.
  • Franz, Kristin

Abstract

Contract-based nature conservation or payments for nature conservation measures are de facto sporadically implemented in forests. Against this background, the joint research project “Nature Conservation Contracts in Forests (WaVerNa Project)” aims to analyze the current implementation status as well as opportunities and constraints of nature conservation contracts in the field of forest ecology, economics and law. In this context representatives of forest enterprises were asked in a nationwide online survey referring to their engagement in forest nature conservation for a consideration. The answers of 195 representatives of forest enterprises which either have already experiences in forest nature conservation contracts or intend its implementation in near future were assessed. Although the online survey was carried out as an open questionnaire, mainly middle-sized and large forest enterprises have participated. Thus, they build a non-representative sample for a nationwide assessment of the implementation practice, referring to payments for nature conservation in forest. As the answers indicate, a large scale of forest nature conservation measures is principally implemented by different funding instruments and programs. These areas cover up to 5 % of the forestal income in most of the consulted forest enterprises. More than half of the enterprises stated, that payments for nature conservation measures contribute up to 5 % of the whole turnover related to forestry. In a few cases these payments for nature conservation in forests significantly exceed the remaining forest income. Three-quarter of the forest enterprises stated positive experiences regarding nature conservation contracts, one third plans to raise its engagement. Less than one third of those forest enterprises, which have already experiences in forest nature conservation, plans to implement nature conservation measures in the future. A possible explanation for this apparent contradiction is that the potential for nature conservation measures is currently exhausted in the forest enterprises. But in summary, the results of the online survey suggest that a scarce demand referring to nature conservation measures in forests does not seem to be the only constraint for limiting the interest on side of forest enterprises. Based up on the results of the online survey, it can be stated further, that a significant increase of forest enterprises’ engagement in nature conservation cannot be expected under the current framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Kownatzki, Dierk & Blomberg, Moritz von & Demant, Laura & Lutter, Carina & Meyer, Peter & Möhring, Bernhard & Paschke, Marian & Seintsch, Björn & Selzer, Anne M. & Franz, Kristin, 2017. "Status quo der Umsetzung von Naturschutz im Wald gegen Entgelt in Deutschland. Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Forstbetrieben," Thünen Working Paper 266397, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:266397
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.266397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266397/files/Thuenen%20Working%20Paper%2081.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266397/files/Thuenen%20Working%20Paper%2081.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.266397?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:266397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imagvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.