IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/jhimwo/339091.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Produktionsökonomische Analyse von Tierwohlmaßnahmen in typischen Milchviehbetrieben Nordwestdeutschlands

Author

Listed:
  • Tergast, Hauke T.

Abstract

Livestock farming is the most important sector of the German agriculture and food industry. With an overall share of 22 percent of the production value of agriculture, milk production is of particularly great economic im-portance and dairy cows are kept on every fifth farm. However, the husbandry practices for dairy cows in Germany are subject to increasing criticism. Insufficient space per animal or a lack of grazing possibilities are regular critiques. There is also scientific evidence of deficits in animal welfare in dairy farming. The legal framework for dairy farming in Germany is relatively unspecific. Whereas specific requirements are laid down in the Animal Welfare Husbandry Ordinance (German: Tierschutz-Nutztierhaltungsverordnung) for keeping poultry and pigs, these are lacking for dairy cattle farming. In addition, farm structures and husbandry conditions are highly heterogeneous. For example, on 24 percent of the farms – predominantly on very small farms – the dairy cows are kept in year-round tethered housing. From a professional, scientific perspective, these conditions lead to major restrictions on natural behaviour. However, deficits in animal welfare were also found on farms with loose housing, with a wide variation between farms. Various market participants have already established animal welfare programs in response to consumer demands for better animal welfare. These usually include a minimum level of resource-related requirements (e.g., space allowance, box length, etc.). However, the products produced in these animal welfare programs have only a small market share. This can be attributed to two main reasons: Firstly, the other market participants' counter-financing of the additional costs is not guaranteed. Secondly, studies show that many consumers do not accept high price premiums for a higher level of animal welfare, even though the issue of animal welfare is given high priority in opinion polls. Voluntary labels, therefore, do not consequently lead to a higher level of animal welfare. The German Federal Ministry of Agriculture appointed the Competence Network Livestock Husbandry (German: Kompetenznetzwerk Nutztierhaltung (KNW)) to solve this dilemma. The KNW presented its recommendations for the sector's future development in 2020. These include introducing three animal welfare levels with a simultaneous gradual increase in the legal requirements for farm animal husbandry. In order not to endanger the competitiveness of German livestock farming and to prevent migration of livestock farming to countries with lower animal welfare standards, the additional costs associated with implementing ...

Suggested Citation

  • Tergast, Hauke T., 2023. "Produktionsökonomische Analyse von Tierwohlmaßnahmen in typischen Milchviehbetrieben Nordwestdeutschlands," Thünen Report 339091, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwo:339091
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.339091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/339091/files/dn067248.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.339091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management; Financial Economics; Livestock Production/Industries;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwo:339091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imagvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.