IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iat19e/312578.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing Market Stability under Climate-Induced Production Shocks: Agricultural Trade and Storage as Adaptation Mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Boere, Esther

Abstract

Climate change and extreme weather events lead to short‐term variability and shocks to agricultural supply, impacting the entire food system and posing threats to food security. Furthermore, instability in the food system may disturb other systems such as energy and water. Studies into the interdependent demand and supply relationships in these systems require a framework that can take stock of both the climate‐induced deviations between expected and observed prices and yields, the impacts on the food commodity market, as well as different adaptation mechanisms that may serve as market stabilization policies, such as storage and different trade‐liberalization mechanisms. This study develops a non‐stationary model for market stabilization policy design, called GLOBIOM‐X. GLOBIOM-X aims to analyze the impact of climate‐induced yield shocks on market stability and how market instability can be contained through the adaptation mechanisms of stockholding and trade liberalization. The model is based on the bio‐economic land use model GLOBIOM. GLOBIOM‐X runs in annual time steps and can address agricultural land use from the producers’ perspective based on expected prices. Stockholding is incorporated in the model by allowing producers to temporarily stock their products and consumers to take‐up products from storage facilities. For the assessment of the effectiveness of trade policies and stockholding options in reducing price spikes and improving food availability, shortfalls in production based on realistic weather events have been quantified. Three types of storage scenarios; baseline‐level storage, unlimited storage and storage including intervention prices and a trade reduction and complete trade liberalization scenario are implemented in order to assess their impact on market stability. Results are assessed in terms of their environmental impacts, equality and profitability. Thereby, this paper helps to give insight to what extent different types of policy measures reduce the negative impacts that yield shocks due to extreme events have on the environment, equitability amongst consumer systems and competitiveness. Both storage and trade liberalization help reduce the increase in greenhouse gas emissions, storage facilities may lead to a more equitable food system on the consumer side, whereas trade liberalization leads to more competitiveness in the EU agri-food business.

Suggested Citation

  • Boere, Esther, 2019. "Assessing Market Stability under Climate-Induced Production Shocks: Agricultural Trade and Storage as Adaptation Mechanisms," 2019: Trading for Good - Agricultural Trade in the Context of Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation... Symposium, June 23-25, 2019, Seville, Spain 312578, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iat19e:312578
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.312578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/312578/files/Session%208%20-%20Boere.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.312578?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iat19e:312578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iatrcea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.