IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae09/51716.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Framework for Assessing of the Impact of Capacity Building

Author

Listed:
  • Templeton, Deborah J.

Abstract

Capacity building is widely recognised as an important component of most research-for-development activities. However despite the fact that around $15 billion is spent annually on capacity building activities, there has been limited assessment of the economic returns to that investment. In recent years, the Impact Assessment Program of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research has turned its attention to quantifying the benefits from capacity-building. This paper sets out a framework for assessing of the impact of capacity building and presents four case studies. It does not purport to be a definitive paper by any means. Rather, it is an account of just one organisations experience. It is hoped that as work on this important area continues, and as new capacity building-to-impact pathways emerge, the analytical framework presented here will continue to be updated.

Suggested Citation

  • Templeton, Deborah J., 2009. "A Framework for Assessing of the Impact of Capacity Building," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51716, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae09:51716
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.51716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/51716/files/Assessing%20the%20benefits%20of%20capacity%20building_D%20Templeton_IAAE.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.51716?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brennan, John P. & Quade, Kathryn J., 2004. "Genetics of, and Breeding for, Rust Resistance in Wheat in India and Pakistan," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113224, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Bueren, Martin, 2004. "Acacia Hybrids in Vietnam," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113223, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
    2. Corbishley, James & Pearce, David, 2006. "Zero Tillage for Weed Control in India: the Contribution to Poverty Alleviation," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113172, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
    3. van Bueren, Martin, 2004. "Eucalypt Tree Improvement in China," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113221, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
    4. Jiang, Tingsong & Pearce, David, 2005. "Shelf-life Extension of Leafy Vegetables: Evaluating the Impacts," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113218, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
    5. Pearce, David, 2005. "Identifying the Sex Pheromone of the Sugarcane Borer Moth Economic impact of ACIAR project CS2/1991/680," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113216, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
    6. Brennan, John P. & Quade, Kathryn J., 2006. "Towards the measurement of the impacts of improving research capacity: an economic evaluation of training in wheat disease resistance," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(2), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Pearce, David & Monck, Michael, 2006. "Benefits to Australia of selected CABI products," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113171, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
    8. Dubin, H.J. & Brennan, John P., 2009. "Combating stem and leaf rust of wheat: Historical perspective, impacts, and lessons learned," IFPRI discussion papers 910, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. John P. Brennan & Kathryn J. Quade, 2006. "Towards the measurement of the impacts of improving research capacity: an economic evaluation of training in wheat disease resistance ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(2), pages 247-263, June.
    10. Pearce, David & Monck, Michael & Chadwick, Kevin & Corbishley, James, 2006. "Benefits to Australia from ACIAR-funded Research," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113213, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae09:51716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.