IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/huaedp/164527.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cooperatives in Kyrgyzstan: Findings from a Survey of Cooperatives and Users

Author

Listed:
  • Lerman, Zvi
  • Sedik, David

Abstract

Most cooperatives in Kyrgyzstan are production cooperatives – successors of former collective farms. • There are hardly any “pure” service cooperatives, although production cooperatives partially fulfill the function of service cooperatives by providing farm services also to non-members.Cooperatives play a positive role in rural life: o sufficiency of services in any given area improves when cooperatives step in to provide the services; o farmers’ perceived wellbeing is higher for cooperative members than for outsiders. • Taxes are not perceived as a major issue by either cooperative managers or farmers. Tax code provisions exempting cooperatives from profit tax and VAT are generally respected. • Government support plays a minor role in agriculture: most cooperative managers and farmers surveyed report that they do not receive any support. This, however, has not led to a major outcry with demands for more government support in the survey. • Formal cooperation manifested in membership in cooperatives is very limited among the farmers surveyed. Informal cooperation is much more widespread, and the substantial gap between the frequency of formal and informal cooperation (8% and 22% of farmers surveyed, respectively) clearly suggests that there is a large potential for development and adoption of service cooperatives in Kyrgyzstan.Cooperatives play a positive role in rural life: o sufficiency of services in any given area improves when cooperatives step in to provide the services; o farmers’ perceived wellbeing is higher for cooperative members than for outsiders. • Taxes are not perceived as a major issue by either cooperative managers or farmers. Tax code provisions exempting cooperatives from profit tax and VAT are generally respected. • Government support plays a minor role in agriculture: most cooperative managers and farmers surveyed report that they do not receive any support. This, however, has not led to a major outcry with demands for more government support in the survey. • Formal cooperation manifested in membership in cooperatives is very limited among the farmers surveyed. Informal cooperation is much more widespread, and the substantial gap between the frequency of formal and informal cooperation (8% and 22% of farmers surveyed, respectively) clearly suggests that there is a large potential for development and adoption of service cooperatives in Kyrgyzstan.

Suggested Citation

  • Lerman, Zvi & Sedik, David, 2013. "Cooperatives in Kyrgyzstan: Findings from a Survey of Cooperatives and Users," Discussion Papers 164527, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:huaedp:164527
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.164527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/164527/files/DP5-13_Kyr_Survey%20Analysis_2_WEB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.164527?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:huaedp:164527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agrhuil.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.