IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ffaf03/16816.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Perspectives On Impacts Of The 2002 U.S. Farm Act

Author

Listed:
  • Westcott, Paul C.

Abstract

The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (2002 Farm Act) was enacted in the United States in May of 2002. While this new farm law introduced some new policies to the array of agricultural commodity programs, in many ways the 2002 farm act extended provisions of the 1996 farm act and institutionalized provisions of ad hoc emergency spending bills of 1998-2001. Three key commodity program features of the 2002 farm act are marketing assistance loans, counter-cyclical payments, and direct payments. Marketing assistance loans existed under previous U.S. farm law, direct payments replaced production flexibility contract payments of the 1996 farm act, and counter-cyclical payments are intended to institutionalize the market loss assistance payments of the past several years. This paper discusses these U.S. farm programs and some of their potential impacts on agricultural markets. An overview of these programs features is first presented, along with an illustration of a con farm's sources of revenues under the new farm act. Then a discussion of some of the impacts of the 2002 farm act is given, commenting on the FAPRI analysis presented by John Kruse. Additional potential impacts of marketing loan provisions of the new law are then discussed, followed by some general comments on potential impacts of counter-cyclical payments, direct payments, and selected additional provisions of the legislation.

Suggested Citation

  • Westcott, Paul C., 2003. "Perspectives On Impacts Of The 2002 U.S. Farm Act," Proceedings of the 9th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 2003: Farm Policy Development and Policy Tensions under NAFTA 16816, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ffaf03:16816
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.16816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/16816/files/ag03we01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.16816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Westcott, Paul C. & Price, J. Michael, 2001. "Analysis Of The U.S. Commodity Loan Program With Marketing Loan Provisions," Agricultural Economic Reports 34035, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Kruse, John R., 2003. "Implications Of The 2002 U.S. Farm Act For World Agriculture," Proceedings of the 9th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 2003: Farm Policy Development and Policy Tensions under NAFTA 16808, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liborio S. Cabanilla, 2006. "Agricultural Trade Between the Philippines and the US : Status, Issues and Prospects," Development Economics Working Papers 22620, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    2. Cabanilla, Liborio S., 2006. "Agricultural Trade Between the Philippines and the US: Status, Issues and Prospects," Discussion Papers DP 2006-05, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gardner, Bruce L., 2002. "North American Agricultural Policies And Effects On Western Hemisphere Markets Since 1995, With A Focus On Grains And Oilseeds," Working Papers 28602, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    2. Ictsd, 2016. "Evaluating Nairobi: What Does the Outcome Mean for Trade in Food and Farm Goods?," Post-Nairobi WTO Agenda 320180, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).
    3. Ahearn, Mary Clare & Collender, Robert N. & Diao, Xinshen & Harrington, David H. & Hoppe, Robert A. & Korb, Penelope J. & Makki, Shiva S. & Morehart, Mitchell J. & Roberts, Michael J. & Roe, Terry L. , 2004. "Decoupled Payments In A Changing Policy Setting," Agricultural Economic Reports 33981, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Gardner, Bruce L., 2008. "Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in the United States and Canada," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 48573, World Bank.
    5. Barry Goodwin & Randy Schnepf & Erik Dohlman, 2005. "Modelling soybean prices in a changing policy environment," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 253-263.
    6. Nadolnyak, Denis A. & Fletcher, Stanley M., 2006. "Quality Premiums and the Post-Harvest Spot Market Thinness: The Case of U.S. Peanuts," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25274, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Andrew Schmitz & Troy G. Schmitz & Frederick Rossi, 2006. "Agricultural Subsidies in Developed Countries: Impact on Global Welfare," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 28(3), pages 416-425.
    8. Khondker, Bazlul H. & Raihan, Selim, 2004. "Welfare and Poverty Impacts of Policy Reforms in Bangladesh: A General Equilibrium Approach," Conference papers 331207, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Gardner, Bruce L., 2002. "U.S./Canadian Agricultural Policies And Effects On Western Hemisphere Markets Since 1995, With A Focus On Grains And Oilseeds," Working Papers 28577, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    10. Ruben N. Lubowski & Andrew J. Plantinga & Robert N. Stavins, 2008. "What Drives Land-Use Change in the United States? A National Analysis of Landowner Decisions," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(4), pages 529-550.
    11. MacDonald, Stephen & Meyer, Leslie & Somwaru, Agapi, 2003. "Perspectives on Cotton Global Trade Reforms," Conference papers 331154, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Westcott, Paul C. & Young, C. Edwin & Price, J. Michael, 2002. "The 2002 Farm Act: Provisions And Implications For Commodity Markets," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33745, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Fousseini Traore, 2011. "The impact of the United States subsidies on world cotton price: evidence from ARDL bounds tests," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(28), pages 4193-4201.
    14. Timothy E. Josling & Stefan Tangermann, 2015. "Transatlantic Food and Agricultural Trade Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15889.
    15. Westcott, Paul C. & Meyer, Leslie A., 2003. "U.S. Cotton Supply Response Under The 2002 Farm Act," Agricultural Outlook Forum 2003 33171, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    16. Young, C. Edwin & Skully, David W. & Westcott, Paul C. & Hoffman, Linwood A., 2005. "Economic Analysis of Base Acre and Payment Yield Designations Under the 2002 U.S. Farm Act," Economic Research Report 33594, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Revoredo-Giha, Cesar & Fletcher, Stanley M., 2003. "Does The Existence Of Market Power Affect Marketing Loan Programs?," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22241, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Brandão, Antônio Salazar P. & Lima, Elcyon Caiado Rocha, 2006. "Impacts of the U.S. subsidy to soybeans on World prices, production and exports," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 44(4), pages 1-46, December.
    19. Nadolnyak, Denis A. & Fletcher, Stanley M. & Revoredo-Giha, Cesar, 2005. "Can Rank-Order Tournaments Improve Efficiency of Quality Differentiated Crop Markets Under Marketing Loan Program Operation? The Case of U.S. Peanuts," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24703, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Luther Tweeten & Carl Zulauf, 2008. "Farm price and income policy: lessons from history," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 145-160.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ffaf03:16816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/farmfus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.