IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/feemwp/314197.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Towards the decarbonization of the power sector – a comparison of China, the EU and the US based on historical data

Author

Listed:
  • Noussan, Michel
  • Hafner, Manfred
  • Campbell, Loyle
  • Lu, Xinqing
  • Raimondi, Pier Paolo
  • Zhu, Erpu

Abstract

This work compares the different decarbonization strategies of the power sector in China, the European Union and the United States, by considering the historical evolution of electricity generation and the current situation. Such a comparison is gaining a broader significance when evaluated with an additional level of geographic detail, by comparing European countries, Chinese provinces, and US states. The differences among these geographies highlight the challenges and opportunities of pushing towards low-carbon technologies, by making clear that regional decarbonization will need to address very different local contexts. Moreover, multiple policy and planning levels are involved, and those mechanisms are different in the three blocs being compared. Our analysis shows that these three blocs, although moving towards similar decarbonization targets, are currently at different levels of carbon intensity. The zero-carbon pathway will need to be declined in different local goals, based on the availability of low-carbon resources and the electricity demand. Given the geographical differences between demand and supply, and the likely increase of electricity demand, an improvement of power transmission networks will be essential. This work is part of a series of papers on the geopolitics of the energy transition in China, the European Union and the United States of America.

Suggested Citation

  • Noussan, Michel & Hafner, Manfred & Campbell, Loyle & Lu, Xinqing & Raimondi, Pier Paolo & Zhu, Erpu, 2021. "Towards the decarbonization of the power sector – a comparison of China, the EU and the US based on historical data," FEEM Working Papers 314197, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:feemwp:314197
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.314197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/314197/files/ndl2021-024.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.314197?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhu, Erpu & Campbell, Loyle & Hafner, Manfred & Lu, Xinqing & Noussan, Michel & Raimondi, Pier Paolo, 2021. "Towards An Inclusive Energy Transition Beyond Coal - A comparison of just transition policies away from coal between China, the EU and the US," FEEM Working Papers 317747, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:feemwp:314197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feemmit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.