IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eerhrr/94888.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Saving the World but Saving Too Much? Pure Time Preference and Saving Rates in Integrated Assessment Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Smith, Kathryn

Abstract

There is a need for a rigorous presentation of the determinants of saving rates in models used to evaluate climate change policy. This report provides a detailed investigation of the implications of Stern’s parameter choices for saving. This is done firstly in standard neoclassical growth theory and then in Nordhaus’s dynamic integrated model of climate and the economy (DICE), a widely used climate policy model that is based on neoclassical growth theory. In theory and practice, optimal saving rates in the presence of near-zero pure time preference are far from the near 100 per cent ones obtained from simpler models used by several critics of the Stern Review. This report shows that in DICE, for the utility function used in the Stern Review, optimal saving rates do not exceed 32 per cent. When using Stern’s revised value for the elasticity of the marginal utility of consumption, this falls to 25 per cent.

Suggested Citation

  • Smith, Kathryn, 2009. "Saving the World but Saving Too Much? Pure Time Preference and Saving Rates in Integrated Assessment Modelling," Research Reports 94888, Australian National University, Environmental Economics Research Hub.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eerhrr:94888
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.94888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/94888/files/EERH_RR39.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.94888?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eerhrr:94888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asanuau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.