IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae08/43925.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Recognizing the Links between Power and Trust in Managing Supply Chain Relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Belaya, Vera
  • Torok, T.
  • Hanf, Jon Henrich

Abstract

In order to manage supply chain relationships effectively both aspects - the need to align the actions in order to coordinate the network and the alignment of interests of cooperating actors – are important. Therefore, the coexistence of both cooperative and competitive constructs should be recognized, where power coexists alongside with trust. Many scientific works have been written on power and trust as constructs of business-to-business relationships separately. However, most of the existing relationship marketing literature studies power and trust in relation to conflict or satisfaction, and the link between power and trust in the supply chain context appears to be largely ignored as a research topic. Some scientists assert that power negates cooperation and call power to be the antithesis of trust. Others argue that most social relationships are based on a mixture of both power and trust, that power and trust by no means exclude each other but occur in combination and that they should both be seen as alternative mechanisms for coordinating supply chain relationships. In order to understand the links between these two constructs one needs to be specific on their nature and origin. Based on the literature review we present ideas on how power and trust in supply chain relationships are related.

Suggested Citation

  • Belaya, Vera & Torok, T. & Hanf, Jon Henrich, 2008. "Recognizing the Links between Power and Trust in Managing Supply Chain Relationships," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43925, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae08:43925
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.43925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/43925/files/186.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.43925?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klein Woolthuis, R. & Nooteboom, B., 2002. "Trust and Formal Control in interorganizational Relationships," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-13-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tuba Bozaykut & F. Gulruh Gurbuz, 2015. "Power and trust in organizational relations: an empirical study in Turkish public hospitals," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Turker, Duygu, 2014. "Analyzing relational sources of power at the interorganizational communication system," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 509-517.
    3. Dudek, Michał, 2011. "Przedsiębiorczość W Agrobiznesie – Perspektywa Strukturalna," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 2(151).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. L. Bottazzi & M. Da Rin & T. Hellmann, 2007. "The Importance of Trust for Investment: Evidence from Venture Capital," Working Papers 612, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    2. Reuer, Jeffrey J. & Arino, Africa & Mellewigt, Thomas, 2006. "Entrepreneurial alliances as contractual forms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 306-325, May.
    3. Thomas Mellewigt & Anoop Madhok & Antoinette Weibel, 2007. "Trust and formal contracts in interorganizational relationships - substitutes and complements," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(8), pages 833-847.
    4. Bottazzi, L. & Da Rin, M. & Hellmann, T., 2010. "The Importance of Trust for Investment : Evidence From Venture Capital (Revision of DP 2009-43)," Other publications TiSEM 27f82ebe-4bae-4bfa-a3a0-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Ayşe Elif Şengün & S. Nazlı Wasti, 2009. "Trust types, distrust, and performance outcomes in small business relationships: the pharmacy--drug warehouse case," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 287-309, January.
    6. Cao, Mengyi & Xia, Qing, 2021. "Trust and use of covenants," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    7. Barendrecht, J.M., 2004. "Cooperation in transactions and disputes : A problem-solving legal system," Discussion Paper 2004-003, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae08:43925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.