IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa172/289709.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Biofuel versus protein policies: what best strategy for self-sufficiency and climate mitigation in the EU?

Author

Listed:
  • Sasu-Boakye, Yaw
  • Valin, Hugo
  • Wirsenius, Stefan
  • Havlik, Petr
  • Hedenus, Fredrik
  • Frank, Stefan
  • Herrero, Mario

Abstract

The European Parliament recently adopted a plan for a European strategy for the promotion of protein crops for food and feed. While the motivation is to reduce further deepening of the dependence on third-party imports, it is also anticipated that increased sourcing of protein feed from the EU will contribute to reduce deforestation and lower GHG emission footprint from EU livestock production. However, a significant part of the protein meals currently sourced from the EU is the result of a different policy, the Renewable Energy Directive, that promotes the use of vegetable oil for fossil fuel substitution in the EU transportation sector. This paper compares two different strategies to decrease reliance of the EU feed protein market to imports - direct support to oilseed production, and incorporation targets for biodiesel in transport. We assess GHG emission impacts of these scenarios using GLOBIOM, a partial equilibrium model of agriculture and land use, enriched with detailed representation of the oilseed supply chains. The results show that direct substitution of soybean feed with protein meal from rapeseed and sunflower decreases deforestation related GHG emissions even though increased demand for agricultural land contributes to higher GHG emissions from agricultural production. Direct substitution of soybean feed leads to net savings if the protein crops are sourced from Europe. However, when a demand for vegetable oil-based biofuel is introduced as the primary driver of feed substitution, the land-use emissions go in opposite direction, with net increase in overall GHG emissions, partly due to additional imports of palm oil from Southeast Asia. Therefore, a supply-oriented policy targeting domestic protein and oil crops appear environmentally preferable to sponsoring demand of vegetable oil for energy use, which shows the importance of connecting better the discussions on the Renewable Energy Directive and the European strategy for the promotion of protein crops for food and feed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sasu-Boakye, Yaw & Valin, Hugo & Wirsenius, Stefan & Havlik, Petr & Hedenus, Fredrik & Frank, Stefan & Herrero, Mario, 2019. "Biofuel versus protein policies: what best strategy for self-sufficiency and climate mitigation in the EU?," 172nd EAAE Seminar, May 28-29, 2019, Brussels, Belgium 289709, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa172:289709
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.289709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/289709/files/Sasu-Boakye-Biofuel%20versus%20protein%20policies-189_a.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.289709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa172:289709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.