IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa165/288288.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mental Models Enlighten Assumptions about Farmers, Land Tenure and Soil Management

Author

Listed:
  • Braito, Michael
  • Flint, Courtney
  • Leonhardt, Heidi
  • Penker, Marianne

Abstract

Agricultural tenancy is increasing, as is soil degradation and erosion. Theory suggests that these trends may be correlated, yet empirical findings are ambiguous. This paper broadens the perspective on mental models influencing farmers’ soil management and disentangles assumed relationships with agricultural land tenancy. Results of a survey of farmers (n=344) in Austria reveal that tenure is less important for understanding farmers’ soil management practices than items of mental models. The study sheds new light on the assumption that farmers’ soil management practices depend on ownership status and planning horizons, as often suggested by agricultural economic theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Braito, Michael & Flint, Courtney & Leonhardt, Heidi & Penker, Marianne, 2019. "Mental Models Enlighten Assumptions about Farmers, Land Tenure and Soil Management," 165th Seminar, April 4-5, 2019, Berlin, Germany 288288, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa165:288288
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.288288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/288288/files/Braito-137.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.288288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Land Economics/Use;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa165:288288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.