IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa118/94920.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating rural development policy - review of the CMEF

Author

Listed:
  • Huelemeyer, Kerstin
  • Schiller, Simone

Abstract

With the Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) a guidance document for evaluation of rural development policy has been published by the European Commission. The CMEF defines the requirements on monitoring and evaluation and specifies a limited number of quantitative common indicators applicable to each programme. While in general the introduction of the CMEF is considered as being a helpful tool for carrying out evaluation, substantial criticism has been expressed regarding the suggested methodological approach and the provided set of impact indicators. Based on qualitative analyses, this article focuses on contributing to a better understanding of the evaluation process in order to learn from stakeholder perceptions and draw conclusions on how evaluation of rural development policy can be improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Huelemeyer, Kerstin & Schiller, Simone, 2010. "Evaluating rural development policy - review of the CMEF," 118th Seminar, August 25-27, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia 94920, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa118:94920
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.94920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/94920/files/Huelemeyer-Evaluating_rural_development_policy-148.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.94920?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Community/Rural/Urban Development;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa118:94920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.