IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa118/94617.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Politico-administrative scenario evaluation through quantitative network analysis: Using Measure 121 (modernization of agricultural holdings) of Axis 1 as an illustration

Author

Listed:
  • Papadopoulou, Eleni
  • Ventouri, Eirini
  • Hasanagas, Nikolaos
  • Papalexiou, Christos

Abstract

In Greece, there is a fostered policy for the modernization of agricultural holdings. This aims in order at improving productivity and environmental performance within a highly competitive international environment. The main research questions are to find what structural changes are desirable or possible to appear in the politico-administrative hierarchy from the 3rd to the 4th Programming Period. Issues of power centralization, information management, dogmatism and conflict are examined. The main method applied for this purpose is the Quantitative Network Analysis. Primary data were collected with standardized questionnaires. State officials have been interviewed. Three scenarios are extracted: a) the real situation of the 3rd PP, b) the desirable situation of the 4th PP, and the probable situation of the 4th PP. Informal hierarchies are measured and visualized. The operationalization of the power dimensions and the other types of links is of crucial importance for the validity and reliability of the results. The results can be useful for policy consulting, if one compares the “probable” and “desirable” scenarios of the 4th PP with the past situation of 3rd PP and particular suggestions can be made. Greece is characterized by a top-down approach of rural development. The process of design and delivery is strongly centralized, and this leads to inflexibility. The bureaucratic procedures and the requirement of too many and possibly unnecessary documents are usual obstacles. The participants present ambitious desires but they also are realists rather than over-optimists concerning the simplicity of the procedures. They believe that the experience of the past can become a lesson for a realistic and not over-optimistic improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Papadopoulou, Eleni & Ventouri, Eirini & Hasanagas, Nikolaos & Papalexiou, Christos, 2010. "Politico-administrative scenario evaluation through quantitative network analysis: Using Measure 121 (modernization of agricultural holdings) of Axis 1 as an illustration," 118th Seminar, August 25-27, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia 94617, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa118:94617
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.94617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/94617/files/118EAAE-CP13-1-Papadopoulou_1_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.94617?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eleni PAPADOPOULOU & Christos PAPALEXIOU & Nikolaos HASANAGAS, 2012. "Participatory Evaluation Of Rural Development Programmes: A Qualitative Approach In The Case Of Modernisation Of Agricultural Holdings In Greece," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 81-94, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Community/Rural/Urban Development;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa118:94617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.