IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcs09/256342.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effects Of Different Levels Of Nitrogen Application And Cutting Intervals On The Dry Matter Yield Of Mulato (Brachiaria Hybrid) And Tanner (Brachiaria Arrecta) Grasses

Author

Listed:
  • Hosein, A.
  • Gibson, N.
  • Ramial, H.

Abstract

One of the methods identified for increasing forage production and the carrying capacity of the land is via the introduction of new and improved grass species. In keeping with this method, a factorial arrangement in a randomised complete block design was used to compare the effects of different levels of nitrogen (N) and cutting intervals on the dry matter (DM) yield of an improved grass, Mulato (Brachiaria sp.) to that of a local grass, Tanner grass (Brachiaria arrecta). At land preparation, agricultural limestone, triple super phosphate and muriate of potash were applied at rates of 1,000 kg/ha, 100 kg /ha and 100 kg/ha, respectively. The area was rotovated immediately after this application and plots (9 m χ 3 m) were cut. Tanner was planted from cuttings of mature plants. Mulato seeds were sown. Seventy-seven days after planting, all plots were cut back to six inches by using a motorized brush cutter and Ν was applied according to treatment, signaling days zero of the regrowth (RG). Harvesting began according to treatment, three, six and nine weeks thereafter. After each harvest, plots were cut back. Harvesting continued for seventy-two weeks. Fresh and dry weights were recorded. Data was analyzed by using Genstat Release 11.1 statistical software and Minitab 15 statistical software. Analysis of the data shows that at 0 kg Ν application, the three-week RG between species varied significantly (P<0.01) with Mulato and Tanner yielding 58,846 kg DM and 46,448 kg DM, respectively, over the 72-week period. However, with Ν applications of 100 kg/ha/yr and 200 kg/ha/yr, yields within and between species were statistically not different. Where no Ν was applied and the RG was harvested at six weeks, no differences were observed. At 100 kg Ν application, the yield of Mulato (49,385 kg DM) was higher (P<0.05) than that of Tanner grass (41,885 kg DM). Increasing Ν application to 200 kg bears no significant benefit (P>0.05) in terms of dry matter yield between or within species. With regard to dry matter yield at nine weeks RG, there was a significant response (P<0.05) by Tanner grass when fertiliser was applied at the 200-kg Ν level when compared to DM yields at 0 and 100 kg N. The highest dry matter yields for both grasses were obtained in the three-week regrowth with Ν applications of 200 kg. Yields were 68,479 kg DM for Mulato over the study period and 54,177 kg DM for Tanner.

Suggested Citation

  • Hosein, A. & Gibson, N. & Ramial, H., 2009. "Effects Of Different Levels Of Nitrogen Application And Cutting Intervals On The Dry Matter Yield Of Mulato (Brachiaria Hybrid) And Tanner (Brachiaria Arrecta) Grasses," 45th Annual Meeting, July 12-17, 2009, Frigate Bay, St. Kitts and Nevis 256342, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs09:256342
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.256342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/256342/files/Hosein-Gibson-Ramial.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.256342?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs09:256342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cfcs.eea.uprm.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.