IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcs08/256488.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparison of Oral Administration of Various Doses of Moxidectin and Ivermectin Pour-On Formulations Against Intestinal Parasites in Meat Goats

Author

Listed:
  • Madden, Uford A.
  • Wilson, N.
  • Nurse, G.
  • Beaudouin, J.

Abstract

A total of 64 meat goats (6 months old) were used to investigate the effects of various doses of two anthelmintics on naturally occurring intestinal parasites in two feeding systems (32 animals each). Animals in the extensive system received grazing only and those in the semi-intensive system received grazing plus 1.1 kg of a 12% protein pellet per head per day. Animals in both systems received treatments of Moxidectin (MOX) and Ivermectin (IVM) at 0.275 mg/kg; 0.550 mg/kg and 0.825 mg/kg bodyweight and 0 mg/kg (CONT). Two males and 2 females were randomly assigned to each treatment. A single dose of MOX or IVM was administered orally to each treated animal at Day 0. A fecal sample was taken from each animal on Days 0, 7, 28, 56, and 84 for evaluation of parasite eggs. Body weights were taken on Days 0, 28, 56, and 84. Sampling began on March 8, 2005 and ended on June 15, 2005. In the extensive system, IVM-treated animals (19.95 kg) had a higher average bodyweight gain than those treated with MOX (17.14 kg). MOX-treated animals, 0.550 mg/kg had slightly higher bodyweight gain (5.77 kg) than CONT animals (5.14 kg). In IVM-treated animals, 0.825 mg/kg had the highest bodyweight gain (6 kg). In the semi-intensive system, MOX-treated animals (25.23 kg) had slightly higher average bodyweight gain than IVM-treated (24.64 kg). MOX-treated, 0.825 mg/kg and CONT animals had similar bodyweight gain (6.59 and 6.54 kg). IVMtreated animals, 0.825 mg/kg had the highest bodyweight gain (7.59 kg). Fecal samples showed marked reductions in parasite egg counts in MOX-, IVM-treated and CONT animals for both systems. In the extensive system, MOX-treated animals, had parasite eggs only in animals treated with 0.550 mg/kg whereas IVM-treated animals had no eggs in animals treated with 0.825 mg/kg, and CONT animals at the end of the study. In the semi-intensive system, no parasite eggs were detected in any sample in MOX- treated but were in CONT animals at the end of the study. In IVM-treated animals, 0.550 mg/kg, and CONT animals, no parasite eggs were detected at the end of the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Madden, Uford A. & Wilson, N. & Nurse, G. & Beaudouin, J., 2008. "Comparison of Oral Administration of Various Doses of Moxidectin and Ivermectin Pour-On Formulations Against Intestinal Parasites in Meat Goats," 44th Annual Meeting, July 13-17, 2008, Miami, Florida, USA 256488, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs08:256488
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.256488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/256488/files/Madden-Wilson-Nurse-Beaudouin.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.256488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs08:256488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cfcs.eea.uprm.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.