IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcs04/256191.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Composted Poultry Litter Effect on Tiller Dynamics, Herbage Mass and Crude Protein Concentration of BRACHIARIA BRIZANTHA CV. Mulato

Author

Listed:
  • Gracia-Pizarro, Emerita
  • Valencia, Elide Valencia

Abstract

Composted poultry litter (CPL) applied to field crops can be an important source of nutrients and organic matter to improve soil quality. However, little is known on the effects of CPL on tiller dynamics and forage yield of the tropical grass Brachiaria brizantha cv. mulatto. A study was conducted in the fall of 2003 and spring of 2004 to evaluate four CPL rates and their influence on number of tillers, herbage mass (g/plant), and crude protein (CP) concentration of cv. Mulato at three harvests at 30-d intervals. Treatments included 0 (Control; C), 16 (low; L), 31 (Medium; M), and 62 kg/ha of Ν (High; H) CPL rates. Grass seedlings (6-wk old) were established in pots (1-gl) filled with soil of the Consumo type (Fine, mixed, semi-active, isohyperthermic Typic Haplohumults). Composted poultry litter was broadcast-applied and incorporated into the first 2-cm of the soil in the pots. Plants were irrigated as needed. From first to the third harvest, there was a minimal increase in tiller count (8.4 to 11) for the control. Corresponding increases observed for the L and M CPL rates were 14 to 28 and 21 to 28 tillers/plant. However, the magnitude of change in tiller counts at the H CPL rate was much greater (21, 23, and 44) at first, second and third harvest, respectively. There was also a linear effect (P<0.05) of CPL rates on herbage mass (g/plant on dry matter basis). For C, there were no changes in herbage mass from first to last harvest (mean of 16 g per plant). For the L and M rates of CPL minimal changes in herbage mass were noted from the first to third harvest. Herbage mass increases from 31 to 56, and 81 g/plant at first, second, and third harvest, respectively at the H CPL rate. There were differences in CP of cv. Mulato with increasing rates of CPL. Crude protein averaged 7.2, 6.6, 7.2, and 9.1% for the C, L, M, and H rates, respectively (a 2 percentage unit increase over C with H CPL). An important aspect of this study is that cv. Mulato can serve as a sink for this nutrient-rich compost and can also provide a profitable and environmentally acceptable use of CPL.

Suggested Citation

  • Gracia-Pizarro, Emerita & Valencia, Elide Valencia, 2004. "Composted Poultry Litter Effect on Tiller Dynamics, Herbage Mass and Crude Protein Concentration of BRACHIARIA BRIZANTHA CV. Mulato," 40th Annual Meeting, July 19-23, 2004, St. Johns, U.S. Virgin Islands 256191, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs04:256191
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.256191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/256191/files/13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.256191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muñoz, H. A. & Martínez, G., 1991. "CHICKEN MANURE: AN ORGANIC NITROGEN FERTILIZER FOR PLANTAINS (Musa acuminata x M. balbisiana AAB)," 27th Annual Meeting, July 14-20, 1991, Roseau, Dominica 259217, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs04:256191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cfcs.eea.uprm.edu/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.