IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcs02/256629.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation Of The Pan Evaporation Method For Scheduling Irrigation On An Oxisol In Puerto Rico

Author

Listed:
  • Harmsen, Eric
  • Colon-Trinidad, Joel Juan
  • Arcelay, Carmen Lis
  • Sarmiento-Esparra, Emily

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pan evaporation method for scheduling irrigation of a sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) crop grown on an Oxisol at the University of Puerto Rico Agricultural Experiment Station at Isabela, PR. Irrigation scheduling refers to a procedure in which water is applied to the field according to the water demand by the crop. Ideally, water should be applied at a rate equal to the potential evapotranspiration rate of the crop minus the effective rainfall. However, when plastic mulch is used to eliminate weed growth, as is common in vegetable production in Puerto Rico, much of the rainfall runs off and is not available to the plants. To minimize the possibility of crop water stress when plastic mulch is used, water should be applied at a rate equal to the crop evapotranspiration rate. If the contribution from rainfall is assumed to be zero, but in fact some rain enters the soil through holes in the plastic, this may produce deep percolation. Deep percolation is undesirable (except as required for salinity control) because it represents a loss of water and fertilizer, and may also contribute to groundwater contamination. The daily pan evaporation-derived evapotranspiration (ETpan) was obtained from the product of pan evaporation (Epan), a pan coefficient (Kp) and the evapotranspiration crop coefficient (Kc). The contribution of water from rainfall was assumed to be zero. However, some rainfall was observed to enter through holes in the plastic mulch where the pepper plants were located. This contribution of water however, was spatially variable and difficult to quantify. Through calibration of a water balance equation, on average twenty five percent of the rainfall was found to enter the soil beds. Evaluation of the pan method for scheduling irrigation was based on comparison of ETpan with the Penman-Monteith-based evapotranspiration (ETC), estimates of deep percolation, measured vertical hydraulic gradients, and measured soil moisture distribution. Seasonal estimates of ETpan and ETC were 350 mm and 401 mm, respectively. The estimated seasonal deep percolation was 60.9 mm. A simulated irrigation schedule using the Penman-Monteith method resulted in even greater seasonal deep percolation (127.7 mm). Vertical hydraulic gradients were observed to be downward throughout a significant portion of the season, and observed moisture content distributions below the root zone clearly indicated that deep percolation was occurring.

Suggested Citation

  • Harmsen, Eric & Colon-Trinidad, Joel Juan & Arcelay, Carmen Lis & Sarmiento-Esparra, Emily, 2002. "Evaluation Of The Pan Evaporation Method For Scheduling Irrigation On An Oxisol In Puerto Rico," 38th Annual Meeting, June 30-July 5, 2002, Trois-Ilets, Martinique 256629, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs02:256629
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.256629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/256629/files/1-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.256629?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs02:256629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cfcs.eea.uprm.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.