IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cars09/122883.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing farmer field school as a sustainable agricultural methodology for farmers in Trinidad and Tobago

Author

Listed:
  • Ramroop, Deanne V.
  • Ragbir, Sarojini

Abstract

Pest management is one of the most limiting factors to crop production in Trinidad and Tobago. Surveys conducted in 1995 revealed that pest control is the single largest expense, accounting for 30 - 40 % of total crop production costs (Lopez et al. 1995). One of the problems identified was the transfer of both existing and new technologies to farmers to ensure development of their knowledge base, leading to sustainable agricultural production. A pilot Farmer Field School (FFS) project in 2003, introduced the use of Farmer Participatory Approaches (FPA) for Ecological Crop Management (ECM) in Trinidad and Tobago. During the period 2004/2008, thirty eight FFS have been conducted with over 400 farmers participating. In order to assess the FFS as a sustainable agricultural methodology, a survey of 106 farmers, who had participated in FFS over the period 2003-2008, was conducted in May 2009. The factors studied were demographic, institutional, environmental, social and economic. The farmers were interviewed in groups in the field and their responses captured using the meta card system of voting. Basic frequency analyses were carried out which indicated that more than 90% of the farmers were very satisfied with the institutional arrangements, became more knowledgeable of the factors related to the environment and agreed that the knowledge gained from the FFS empowered them to make more sustainable agricultural crop management decisions. More than 79% of the farmers had adopted the integrated pest management (IPM) technology transferred using the FFS methodology and are currently using these IPM practices. This paper outlines and underscores the need for continued assessments of Farmer Field Schools and related Farmer Participatory Approaches to determine whether they could be used as sustainable agricultural methodologies for farmers in Trinidad and Tobago.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramroop, Deanne V. & Ragbir, Sarojini, 2010. "Assessing farmer field school as a sustainable agricultural methodology for farmers in Trinidad and Tobago," 28th West Indies Agricultural Economic Conference/2009 Barbados National Agricultural Conference, July 2009, Barbados 122883, Caribbean Agro-Economic Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cars09:122883
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.122883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/122883/files/Assessing%20farmer%20field%20school%20as%20a%20sustainable%20agricultural%20methodology%20for%20farmers%20in%20Trinidad%20and%20Tobago.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.122883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammadi Torkashvand, Ali & Allahyari, Mohammad Sadegh & Daghighi Masuleh, Zahra, 2014. "Identifying Indicators of Environmentally Sustainable Agriculture in Paddy Fields of Guilan Province," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 4(1), pages 1-7, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cars09:122883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caestea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.